
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Core i9-9880H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-9880H.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i9-9880H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Core i9-9880H
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,531 vs 19,532).
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Core i9-9880H
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of BGA1440 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i9-9880H.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Core i9-9880H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,531 vs 19,532).
- ❌Older platform position on BGA1440 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Core i9-9880H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i9-9880H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 235 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i9-9880H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 338 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 332 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 331 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 284 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 319 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 215 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i9-9880H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 338 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 338 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 338 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 338 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 338 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 322 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Core i9-9880H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 338 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 338 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 338 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 338 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 338 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 338 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Core i9-9880H

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Core i9-9880H
Core i9-9880H
The Core i9-9880H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-HR (2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,531 points. Launch price was $556.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core i9-9880H offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-9880H has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.8 GHz on the Core i9-9880H — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Core i9-9880H (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-9880H uses Coffee Lake-HR (2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Core i9-9880H's 13,531 — a 36.3% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Core i9-9880H.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i9-9880H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.8 GHz+9% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+9% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Coffee Lake-HR (2019) |
| PassMark | 19,532+44% | 13,531 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i9-9880H uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i9-9880H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | BGA1440 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Core i9-9880H). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Core i9-9880H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












