Core i5-12400F vs EPYC 7702P

CPU

GPU

Core i5-12400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2022

Popular choices:

•••••••••

EPYC 7702P

64 Cores128 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.35 GHz2019

Popular choices:

i5-12400F•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i5-12400F

6 / 12

19,532

0.0%

63,692

+226.1%

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-12400F

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,251 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
✅Delivers 679.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 14.4 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 7702P.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7702P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 63,692).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7702P, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

EPYC 7702P

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($4,425 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Core i5-12400F

2022

EPYC 7702P

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $4,251 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
✅Delivers 679.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 14.4 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $4,425 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike EPYC 7702P.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 7702P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 63,692).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7702P, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.4 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($4,425 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 7702P better than Core i5-12400F?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7702P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-12400F is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 7702P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 4.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 256 MB vs 18 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7702P is the better fit. You are getting 226.1% better PassMark, backed by 64 cores and 128 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 1322.2% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 18 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 7702P is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-12400F makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. EPYC 7702P is 2443.1% more expensive on MSRP at $4,425 MSRP versus $174 MSRP, and it gives you a 4.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-12400F is also 679.9% better value on MSRP (112.3 vs 14.4 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-12400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of TR4. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-12400F Benchmark Check

EPYC 7702P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	EPYC 7702P
1080p
low	183 FPS	192 FPS
medium	168 FPS	172 FPS
high	139 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	119 FPS	110 FPS
1440p
low	153 FPS	157 FPS
medium	132 FPS	132 FPS
high	106 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	89 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	87 FPS	72 FPS
medium	81 FPS	65 FPS
high	64 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	49 FPS	40 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open EPYC 7702P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-12400F	EPYC 7702P
1080p
low	471 FPS	247 FPS
medium	397 FPS	221 FPS
high	341 FPS	183 FPS
ultra	301 FPS	148 FPS
1440p
low	407 FPS	202 FPS
medium	351 FPS	186 FPS
high	309 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	265 FPS	124 FPS
4K
low	282 FPS	126 FPS
medium	248 FPS	118 FPS
high	229 FPS	103 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	84 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open EPYC 7702P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-12400F	EPYC 7702P
1080p
low	488 FPS	629 FPS
medium	488 FPS	536 FPS
high	488 FPS	486 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	415 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	524 FPS
medium	488 FPS	446 FPS
high	485 FPS	394 FPS
ultra	434 FPS	338 FPS
4K
low	442 FPS	389 FPS
medium	389 FPS	312 FPS
high	337 FPS	274 FPS
ultra	274 FPS	224 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open EPYC 7702P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-12400F	EPYC 7702P
1080p
low	488 FPS	904 FPS
medium	488 FPS	823 FPS
high	488 FPS	706 FPS
ultra	488 FPS	610 FPS
1440p
low	488 FPS	711 FPS
medium	488 FPS	620 FPS
high	488 FPS	530 FPS
ultra	473 FPS	450 FPS
4K
low	488 FPS	503 FPS
medium	450 FPS	452 FPS
high	391 FPS	398 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	343 FPS

Open Core i5-12400F Open EPYC 7702P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and EPYC 7702P

Core i5-12400F

The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

EPYC 7702P

The EPYC 7702P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.35 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 63,692 points. Launch price was $4,425.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the EPYC 7702P offers 64 cores / 128 threads — the EPYC 7702P has 58 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 3.35 GHz on the EPYC 7702P — a 27.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7702P uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the EPYC 7702P's 63,692 — a 106.1% lead for the EPYC 7702P. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 7702P.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	EPYC 7702P
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	64 / 128+967%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+31%	3.35 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+25%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	18 MB (total)	256 MB (total)+1322%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512K (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark	19,532	63,692+226%
Cinebench R23 Multi	12,380	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,700	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	657	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 7702P uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus 3200 on the EPYC 7702P — the EPYC 7702P supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7702P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-12400F) vs 8 (EPYC 7702P). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 128 (EPYC 7702P) — the EPYC 7702P offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and SP3 (EPYC 7702P).

Feature	Core i5-12400F	EPYC 7702P
Socket	LGA1700	TR4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	3200+63900%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+3276700%	4096
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	128+540%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 7702P). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; EPYC 7702P rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.

Feature	Core i5-12400F	EPYC 7702P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Gaming Performance/Value	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the EPYC 7702P debuted at $4425. On MSRP ($174 vs $4425), the Core i5-12400F is $4251 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 14.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 7702P — making the Core i5-12400F the 154.5% better value option.