
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Processor N100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +254.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Delivers 195.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 38.0 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Processor N100.
Trade-offs
- ❌35.9% HIGHER MSRP$174 MSRPvs$128 MSRP
Processor N100
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $46 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,869 vs 19,532).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.0 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Processor N100
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +254.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (18 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Delivers 195.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 38.0 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Processor N100.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $46 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌35.9% HIGHER MSRP$174 MSRPvs$128 MSRP
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (4,869 vs 19,532).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 18 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 38.0 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Processor N100?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Processor N100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Processor N100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 107 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 40 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Processor N100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 122 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Processor N100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 122 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Processor N100

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Processor N100
Processor N100
The Processor N100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 4,869 points. Launch price was $128.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Processor N100 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-12400F has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 3.4 GHz on the Processor N100 — a 25.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 0.1 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Processor N100 uses Alder Lake-N (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Processor N100's 4,869 — a 120.2% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 6 MB (total) on the Processor N100.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Processor N100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12+50% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+29% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+2400% | 0.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+200% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (total)+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
| PassMark | 19,532+301% | 4,869 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Processor N100 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Processor N100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA1264 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Processor N100). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Processor N100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Processor N100 debuted at $128. On MSRP ($174 vs $128), the Processor N100 is $46 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 38.0 pts/$ for the Processor N100 — making the Core i5-12400F the 98.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Processor N100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174 | $128-26% |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3+196% | 38.0 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












