
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 7400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $55 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 96.1 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 7400.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 22,010).
Ryzen 5 7400
2025Why buy it
- ✅+12.7% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 96.1 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($229 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Ryzen 5 7400
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $55 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 96.1 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 7400.
Why buy it
- ✅+12.7% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 22,010).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 96.1 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($229 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 7400 better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 72 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 296 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 256 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 229 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 200 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 182 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 146 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 550 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 550 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 531 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 481 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 419 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 349 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 239 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 550 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 550 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 550 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 550 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 533 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 445 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 379 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 5 7400

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.


Ryzen 5 7400
Ryzen 5 7400
The Ryzen 5 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,010 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 5 7400 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7400 — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7400 uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen 5 7400's 22,010 — a 11.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 7400. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7400.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+2% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz+32% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 22,010+13% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 7400 uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Ryzen 5 7400). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 7400 debuted at $229. On MSRP ($174 vs $229), the Core i5-12400F is $55 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 96.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 7400 — making the Core i5-12400F the 15.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174-24% | $229 |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3+17% | 96.1 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











