
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 22,132).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.5% higher average FPS across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 6W instead of 65W, a 59W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (19,532 vs 22,132).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌983.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 6W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 371 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 388 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 297 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 254 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 194 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 537 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 517 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 445 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 502 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 444 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 378 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 312 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 547 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 553 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 387 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.


Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
The Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: LPDDR5x, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,132 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS (base: 2.5 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS uses Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS's 22,132 — a 12.5% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 4.3 GHz+72% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 6 MB+380% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 22,132+13% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











