
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 8845HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 8845HS.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8845HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,380 vs 17,500).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8845HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 8845HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 8845HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +29.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Ryzen 7 8845HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 7 8845HS.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +29.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8845HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,380 vs 17,500).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8845HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 8845HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 8845HS better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 162 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 341 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 314 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 267 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 280 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 204 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 712 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 712 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 623 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 712 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 644 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 544 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 467 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 474 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 357 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 712 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 712 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 712 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 712 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 657 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 572 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 393 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen 7 8845HS

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.


Ryzen 7 8845HS
Ryzen 7 8845HS
The Ryzen 7 8845HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,470 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 8845HS offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 8845HS has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8845HS — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8845HS (base: 2.5 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8845HS uses Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen 7 8845HS's 28,470 — a 37.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 8845HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,380 vs 17,500 (34.3% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8845HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,700 vs 2,500, a 38.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 8845HS that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 12,250 (179.6% advantage for the Ryzen 7 8845HS). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8845HS.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | 3.8 GHz+52% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 28,470+46% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | 17,500+41% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | 2,500+47% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | 12,250+1765% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 8845HS uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 8845HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and SoC (Ryzen 7 8845HS).
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | LPDDR5x-7500 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 7 8845HS). The Ryzen 7 8845HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Ryzen 7 8845HS targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; Ryzen 7 8845HS rivals Core i7-13700H.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen 7 8845HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 780M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V (SVM) |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











