
Core i5-12400F
Popular choices:

Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen AI 9 HX 375.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,700 vs 2,865).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,380 vs 22,246).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024Why buy it
- ✅+68.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 890M, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Core i5-12400F
2022Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
2024Why buy it
- ✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen AI 9 HX 375.
Why buy it
- ✅+68.5% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 890M, while Core i5-12400F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,700 vs 2,865).
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (12,380 vs 22,246).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $174 MSRP, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 better than Core i5-12400F?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 168 FPS | 230 FPS |
| high | 139 FPS | 192 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 165 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 106 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 130 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 471 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 341 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 301 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 407 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 351 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 309 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 265 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 282 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 248 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 229 FPS | 135 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 115 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 738 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 587 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 429 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 661 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 533 FPS |
| high | 485 FPS | 455 FPS |
| ultra | 434 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 442 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 389 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 337 FPS | 359 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 301 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 865 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 809 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 694 FPS |
| ultra | 488 FPS | 625 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 757 FPS |
| medium | 488 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 488 FPS | 583 FPS |
| ultra | 473 FPS | 515 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 488 FPS | 518 FPS |
| medium | 450 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 391 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 369 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-12400F and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375

Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.


Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 34,585 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375's 34,585 — a 55.6% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,380 vs 22,246 (57% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,700 vs 2,865, a 51% lead for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 15,100 (183.3% advantage for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 16 MB on the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 12 / 24+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+25% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+25% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 34,585+77% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | 22,246+80% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | 2,865+69% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | 15,100+2198% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375) — the Core i5-12400F offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and SoC (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375).
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | LPDDR5x-8000, DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (Ryzen AI 9 HX 375). The Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 includes integrated graphics (Radeon 890M), while the Core i5-12400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 targets AI-Notebook. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600; Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 rivals Ryzen AI 9 HX 370.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 890M |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V, AMD-Vi |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | AI-Notebook |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-12400F launched at $174 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($174 vs $0), the Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is $174 cheaper.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3 | — |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











