
Core i5-12400F

Xeon E5-2618L v4
Core i5-12400F vs Xeon E5-2618L v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-12400F vs Xeon E5-2618L v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-12400F vs Xeon E5-2618L v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $605 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $779 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 603.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 16.0 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $779 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 75W, a 10W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 25 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2618L v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.
Xeon E5-2618L v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+38.9% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,429 vs 19,532).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.0 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($779 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 75W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Xeon E5-2618L v4?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12400F vs Xeon E5-2618L v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Xeon E5-2618L v4
The Xeon E5-2618L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 12,429 points. Launch price was $779.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2618L v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2618L v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2618L v4 — a 66.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F. The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2618L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Xeon E5-2618L v4's 12,429 — a 44.4% lead for the Core i5-12400F. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2618L v4.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon E5-2618L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 10 / 20+67% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+100% | 2.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 25 MB+39% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB+100% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 19,532+57% | 12,429 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) / not specified (Xeon E5-2618L v4). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon E5-2618L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-12400F was priced at $174, while the Xeon E5-2618L v4 came in at $779. On launch pricing ($174 vs $779), Core i5-12400F was $605 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 16.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2618L v4 — making the Core i5-12400F the 150.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon E5-2618L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174-78% | $779 |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3+602% | 16.0 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2016 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














