
Core i5-12400F

Xeon Gold 6138
Core i5-12400F vs Xeon Gold 6138 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-12400F vs Xeon Gold 6138 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-12400F vs Xeon Gold 6138: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-12400F
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +8.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $2,438 less on MSRP ($174 MSRP vs $2,612 MSRP).
- β Delivers 1116.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 112.3 vs 9.2 PassMark/$ ($174 MSRP vs $2,612 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- β Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βLower Geekbench multi-core (657 vs 15,439).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 28 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6138, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
Xeon Gold 6138
2017Why buy it
- β +2249.9% higher Geekbench multi-core.
- β +52.8% larger total L3 cache (28 MB vs 18 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- β 140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-12400F across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 9.2 vs 112.3 PassMark/$ ($2,612 MSRP vs $174 MSRP).
- β92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- βOlder platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400F moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- βNo boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400F better than Xeon Gold 6138?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12400F vs Xeon Gold 6138 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12400F
The Core i5-12400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,532 points. Launch price was $180.

Xeon Gold 6138
The Xeon Gold 6138 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 25 April 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017β2018) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 27.5 MB. L2 cache: 20 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 24,108 points. Launch price was $2,612.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6138 offers 20 cores / 40 threads β the Xeon Gold 6138 has 14 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-12400F versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6138 β a 17.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400F (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-12400F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6138 uses Skylake (server) (2017β2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400F scores 19,532 against the Xeon Gold 6138's 24,108 β a 21% lead for the Xeon Gold 6138. Geekbench 6 single-core β the metric most relevant to gaming β records 1,700 vs 1,261, a 29.7% lead for the Core i5-12400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 657 vs 15,439 (183.7% advantage for the Xeon Gold 6138). L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400F vs 27.5 MB on the Xeon Gold 6138.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon Gold 6138 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 20 / 40+233% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+19% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz+25% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 27.5 MB+53% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 20 MB+1500% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Skylake (server) (2017β2018) |
| PassMark | 19,532 | 24,108+23% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,380 | β |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,700+35% | 1,261 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 657 | 15,439+2250% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Gold 6138 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 on the Core i5-12400F versus DDR4-2666 on the Xeon Gold 6138 β the Core i5-12400F supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6138 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-12400F) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6138). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400F) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6138) β the Xeon Gold 6138 offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,H770,Z790 (Core i5-12400F) and C621 (Xeon Gold 6138).
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon Gold 6138 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200+80% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 768 GB+500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 48+140% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400F) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon Gold 6138). Primary use case: Core i5-12400F targets Gaming Performance/Value, Xeon Gold 6138 targets Server. Direct competitor: Core i5-12400F rivals Ryzen 5 5600.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon Gold 6138 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | β | None |
| Unlocked | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Gaming Performance/Value | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-12400F was priced at $174, while the Xeon Gold 6138 came in at $2612. On launch pricing ($174 vs $2612), Core i5-12400F was $2438 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400F delivers 112.3 pts/$ vs 9.2 pts/$ for the Xeon Gold 6138 β making the Core i5-12400F the 169.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12400F | Xeon Gold 6138 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $174-93% | $2612 |
| Performance per Dollar | 112.3+1121% | 9.2 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














