
Core i5-12400T

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
Core i5-12400T vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-12400T vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-12400T vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-12400T
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $207 less on MSRP ($192 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 107.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.0 vs 39.0 PassMark/$ ($192 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 730, while Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (15,543 vs 15,570).
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.0 vs 81.0 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $192 MSRP).
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Core i5-12400T moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-12400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12400T.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-12400T better than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12400T vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12400T
The Core i5-12400T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 15,543 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,570 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12400T packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.2 GHz on the Core i5-12400T versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X — a 10% clock advantage for the Core i5-12400T (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-12400T uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12400T scores 15,543 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X's 15,570 — a 0.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-12400T vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X.
| Feature | Core i5-12400T | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.2 GHz+11% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 3.4 GHz+89% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+13% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+40860% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 15,543 | 15,570 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,650 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 7,800 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12400T uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-12400T versus DDR4-2666 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X — the Core i5-12400T supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12400T supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12400T) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X) — the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Core i5-12400T | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+80% | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 24+20% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12400T) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X). The Core i5-12400T includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 730), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12400T targets Office/Home Desktop, Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i5-12400T | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | — |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Office/Home Desktop | Desktop |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-12400T was priced at $192, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X came in at $399. On launch pricing ($192 vs $399), Core i5-12400T was $207 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12400T delivers 81.0 pts/$ vs 39.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X — making the Core i5-12400T the 69.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12400T | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $192-52% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.0+108% | 39.0 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2017 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














