
Core i5-12490F

Core Ultra 9 288V
Core i5-12490F vs Core Ultra 9 288V Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-12490F vs Core Ultra 9 288V FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-12490F vs Core Ultra 9 288V: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-12490F
2022Why buy it
- ✅+34.4% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($250 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 141.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 81.5 vs 33.8 PassMark/$ ($250 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
- ✅150% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 9 288V across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌116.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 30W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core Ultra 9 288V can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core Ultra 9 288V
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 65W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel Arc 140V, while Core i5-12490F needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (9,300 vs 12,500).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 33.8 vs 81.5 PassMark/$ ($600 MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-12490F.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 9 288V better than Core i5-12490F?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-12490F vs Core Ultra 9 288V Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-12490F
The Core i5-12490F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 20,366 points. Launch price was $299.

Core Ultra 9 288V
The Core Ultra 9 288V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 September 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Lunar Lake (2024) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 2.5 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2833. Thermal design power (TDP): 30 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,280 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-12490F packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Core Ultra 9 288V offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the Core Ultra 9 288V has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-12490F versus 5.1 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 288V — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 288V (base: 3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-12490F uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (10 nm), while the Core Ultra 9 288V uses Lunar Lake (2024) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-12490F scores 20,366 against the Core Ultra 9 288V's 20,280 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-12490F. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 12,500 vs 9,300 (29.4% advantage for the Core i5-12490F). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,800 vs 2,800, a 43.5% lead for the Core Ultra 9 288V that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 8,800 vs 10,000 (12.8% advantage for the Core Ultra 9 288V). L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-12490F vs 12 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 288V.
| Feature | Core i5-12490F | Core Ultra 9 288V |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 8+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.6 GHz | 5.1 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | 3 GHz | 3.3 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+67% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 10 nm | 3 nm-70% |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
| PassMark | 20,366 | 20,280 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 12,500+34% | 9,300 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,800 | 2,800+56% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 8,800 | 10,000+14% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-12490F uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core Ultra 9 288V uses FCBGA2833 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-12490F versus LPDDR5X-8533 on the Core Ultra 9 288V — the Core Ultra 9 288V supports 77.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-12490F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-12490F) vs 8 (Core Ultra 9 288V) — the Core i5-12490F offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: B660,H610,H670,Z690,B760 (Core i5-12490F) and SoC (Core Ultra 9 288V).
| Feature | Core i5-12490F | Core Ultra 9 288V |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA2833 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | LPDDR5X-8533+78% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+300% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+150% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-12490F) vs true (Core Ultra 9 288V). The Core Ultra 9 288V includes integrated graphics (Intel Arc 140V), while the Core i5-12490F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-12490F targets Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-12490F rivals Ryzen 5 5600X.
| Feature | Core i5-12490F | Core Ultra 9 288V |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | Intel Arc 140V |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | true |
| Target Use | Gaming Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i5-12490F was priced at $250, while the Core Ultra 9 288V came in at $600. On launch pricing ($250 vs $600), Core i5-12490F was $350 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-12490F delivers 81.5 pts/$ vs 33.8 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 9 288V — making the Core i5-12490F the 82.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-12490F | Core Ultra 9 288V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $250-58% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 81.5+141% | 33.8 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















