Core i5-13500E vs Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U

Intel

Core i5-13500E

14 Cores20 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.6 GHz2023
Core family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U

8 Cores16 Thrd28 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2024
Similar parts
·······

Core i5-13500E vs Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13500E vs Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13500E vs Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13500E

2023

Why buy it

  • +57.7% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Launch MSRP is still $235 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U

2024

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +19.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (13,450 vs 21,216).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U better than Core i5-13500E?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is ahead with a 19.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13500E pulls ahead with 57.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i5-13500E also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13500E is the stronger fit. You are getting 57.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is still the faster CPU overall, but Core i5-13500E is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $235 MSRP, and it still gives you a 19.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-13500E is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 57.7% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Core i5-13500E is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (102.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13500E vs Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i5-13500E

The Core i5-13500E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 24,096 points. Launch price was $299.

AMD

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,934 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13500E packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13500E has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13500E versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U — a 10.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i5-13500E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13500E scores 24,096 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U's 23,934 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-13500E. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,216 vs 13,450 (44.8% advantage for the Core i5-13500E). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,862 vs 2,400, a 25.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,166 vs 9,500 (39.4% advantage for the Core i5-13500E). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-13500E vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U.

FeatureCore i5-13500ERyzen 7 PRO 8840U
Cores / Threads
14 / 20+75%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.6 GHz
5.1 GHz+11%
Base Clock
2.4 GHz
3.3 GHz+38%
L3 Cache
24 MB (total)+50%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.25 MB (per core)+25%
1 MB (per core)
Process
10 nm
4 nm-60%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark
24,096
23,934
Cinebench R23 Multi
21,216+58%
13,450
Geekbench 6 Single
1,862
2,400+29%
Geekbench 6 Multi
14,166+49%
9,500
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13500E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-13500E versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U — the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: W680,Q670 (Core i5-13500E) and FP7,FP8 (Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U).

FeatureCore i5-13500ERyzen 7 PRO 8840U
Socket
LGA1700
FP7
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-4800
DDR5-5600+17%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
256 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
20
20
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13500E) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13500E) and Radeon 780M (Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U rivals Core Ultra 7 164U.

FeatureCore i5-13500ERyzen 7 PRO 8840U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 770
Radeon 780M
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
Yes
Yes
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V
Target Use
Gaming