PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13500E vs Xeon E5-2679 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13500E vs Xeon E5-2679 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13500E

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $2,467 less on MSRP ($235 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1048.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 102.5 vs 8.9 PassMark/$ ($235 MSRP vs $2,702 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 200W, a 135W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011-3 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 50 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2679 v4, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2679 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (50 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13500E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (12,000 vs 14,166).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.9 vs 102.5 PassMark/$ ($2,702 MSRP vs $235 MSRP).
❌207.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011-3 with DDR4, while Core i5-13500E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13500E better than Xeon E5-2679 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2679 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13500E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-13500E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-13500E is the stronger fit. You are getting 18.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 14 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13500E is the better buy right now. Core i5-13500E comes in $2,467 cheaper on MSRP at $235 MSRP versus $2,702 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 1048.1% better value on MSRP (102.5 vs 8.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13500E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011-3, more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 20 threads instead of 20/40, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13500E vs Xeon E5-2679 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13500E

The Core i5-13500E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 24,096 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-2679 v4

The Xeon E5-2679 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 50 MB. L2 cache: 5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011-3. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 24,131 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13500E packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon E5-2679 v4 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.6 GHz on the Core i5-13500E versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2679 v4 — a 32.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-13500E (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-13500E uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13500E scores 24,096 against the Xeon E5-2679 v4's 24,131 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2679 v4. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,862 vs 1,000, a 60.2% lead for the Core i5-13500E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,166 vs 12,000 (16.6% advantage for the Core i5-13500E). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-13500E vs 50 MB on the Xeon E5-2679 v4.

Feature	Core i5-13500E	Xeon E5-2679 v4
Cores / Threads	14 / 20	20 / 40+43%
Boost Clock	4.6 GHz+39%	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.5 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	50 MB+108%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)	5 MB+300%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	24,096	24,131
Cinebench R23 Multi	21,216	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,862+86%	1,000
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,166+18%	12,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13500E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 uses LGA2011-3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i5-13500E versus DDR4-2400 on the Xeon E5-2679 v4 — the Core i5-13500E supports 100% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2679 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-13500E) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2679 v4). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i5-13500E) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2679 v4) — the Xeon E5-2679 v4 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: W680,Q670 (Core i5-13500E) and C612,X99 (Xeon E5-2679 v4).

Feature	Core i5-13500E	Xeon E5-2679 v4
Socket	LGA1700	LGA2011-3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+100%	DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1536 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	40+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i5-13500E supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-13500E) vs Yes (Xeon E5-2679 v4). The Core i5-13500E includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 requires a dedicated GPU.

Feature	Core i5-13500E	Xeon E5-2679 v4
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	Yes	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	Yes

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13500E was priced at $235, while the Xeon E5-2679 v4 came in at $2702. On launch pricing ($235 vs $2702), Core i5-13500E was $2467 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13500E delivers 102.5 pts/$ vs 8.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2679 v4 — making the Core i5-13500E the 168% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-13500E	Xeon E5-2679 v4
MSRP	$235-91%	$2702
Performance per Dollar	102.5+1052%	8.9
Release Date	2023	2016

Search Core i5-13500E on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2679 v4 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.