
Core i5-13500TE

EPYC 7203P
Core i5-13500TE vs EPYC 7203P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13500TE vs EPYC 7203P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13500TE vs EPYC 7203P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13500TE
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +11.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 120W, a 85W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 770, while EPYC 7203P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,936 vs 22,017).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $235 MSRP, while EPYC 7203P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
EPYC 7203P
2023Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13500TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌242.9% higher power demand at 120W vs 35W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i5-13500TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13500TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13500TE better than EPYC 7203P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13500TE vs EPYC 7203P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13500TE
The Core i5-13500TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 21,936 points. Launch price was $299.

EPYC 7203P
The EPYC 7203P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 22,017 points. Launch price was $348.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13500TE packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the EPYC 7203P offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13500TE has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-13500TE versus 3.4 GHz on the EPYC 7203P — a 27.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-13500TE (base: 1.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-13500TE uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 7203P uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13500TE scores 21,936 against the EPYC 7203P's 22,017 — a 0.4% lead for the EPYC 7203P. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-13500TE vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7203P.
| Feature | Core i5-13500TE | EPYC 7203P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+32% | 3.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.3 GHz | 2.8 GHz+115% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 21,936 | 22,017 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,500 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,100 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13500TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7203P uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13500TE | EPYC 7203P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13500TE) / not specified (EPYC 7203P). The Core i5-13500TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 7203P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13500TE targets Industrial / Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i5-13500TE rivals Core i5-12500TE.
| Feature | Core i5-13500TE | EPYC 7203P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Industrial / Embedded | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















