Core i5-13500TE vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Core i5-13500TE vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-13500TE

14 / 20

21,936

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

12 / 24

22,066

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen 9 9900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-13500TE vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-13500TE vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-13500TE

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $564 less on MSRP ($235 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Delivers 238.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 93.3 vs 27.6 PassMark/$ ($235 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 140W, a 105W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3r2 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (21,936 vs 22,066).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13500TE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 93.3 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $235 MSRP).
❌300% higher power demand at 140W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on SP3r2 with DDR4, while Core i5-13500TE moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13500TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-13500TE better than Ryzen Threadripper 1920?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Ryzen Threadripper 1920 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-13500TE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-13500TE is the better buy right now. Core i5-13500TE comes in $564 cheaper on MSRP at $235 MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.6% better PassMark. It is also 238.0% better value on MSRP (93.3 vs 27.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-13500TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2017) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of SP3r2. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i5-13500TE vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13500TE

The Core i5-13500TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 21,936 points. Launch price was $299.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920

The Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,066 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-13500TE packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Core i5-13500TE has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Core i5-13500TE versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — a 16.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-13500TE (base: 1.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-13500TE uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (10 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13500TE scores 21,936 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920's 22,066 — a 0.6% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920. L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-13500TE vs 32 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920.

Feature	Core i5-13500TE	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Cores / Threads	14 / 20+17%	12 / 24
Boost Clock	4.5 GHz+18%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	1.3 GHz	3.2 GHz+146%
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	32 MB+33%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+150%	512 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	21,936	22,066
Cinebench R23 Multi	14,500	—
Geekbench 6 Single	2,100	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	11,000	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13500TE uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-13500TE	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Socket	LGA1700	SP3r2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13500TE) / not specified (Ryzen Threadripper 1920). The Core i5-13500TE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 770), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13500TE targets Industrial / Embedded. Direct competitor: Core i5-13500TE rivals Core i5-12500TE.

Feature	Core i5-13500TE	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Industrial / Embedded	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-13500TE was priced at $235, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 came in at $799. On launch pricing ($235 vs $799), Core i5-13500TE was $564 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13500TE delivers 93.3 pts/$ vs 27.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 — making the Core i5-13500TE the 108.7% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-13500TE	Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP	$235-71%	$799
Performance per Dollar	93.3+238%	27.6
Release Date	2023	2017

Search Core i5-13500TE on Amazon

Search Ryzen Threadripper 1920 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.