
Core i5-13600
Popular choices:

Core i7-13700K
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-13600
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $154 less on MSRP ($255 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 123.5 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($255 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13700K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,000 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 111.9 vs 123.5 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13600.
Core i5-13600
2023Core i7-13700K
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $154 less on MSRP ($255 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 123.5 vs 111.9 PassMark/$ ($255 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 125W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-13700K.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-13700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (21,000 vs 31,000).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 111.9 vs 123.5 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $255 MSRP).
- ❌92.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 65W.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-13600.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-13700K better than Core i5-13600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 260 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 250 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 238 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 159 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 154 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 89 FPS | 90 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-13600 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 609 FPS | 689 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 484 FPS |
| ultra | 402 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 525 FPS | 595 FPS |
| medium | 465 FPS | 525 FPS |
| high | 396 FPS | 441 FPS |
| ultra | 341 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 309 FPS | 348 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 261 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-13600 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 648 FPS | 648 FPS |
| medium | 527 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 467 FPS | 467 FPS |
| ultra | 405 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 591 FPS | 591 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 491 FPS |
| high | 425 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 370 FPS | 371 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 373 FPS | 374 FPS |
| high | 334 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 285 FPS | 290 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-13600 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 787 FPS | 970 FPS |
| medium | 787 FPS | 883 FPS |
| high | 726 FPS | 766 FPS |
| ultra | 645 FPS | 689 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 787 FPS | 829 FPS |
| medium | 702 FPS | 740 FPS |
| high | 608 FPS | 642 FPS |
| ultra | 529 FPS | 566 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 555 FPS | 567 FPS |
| medium | 504 FPS | 515 FPS |
| high | 449 FPS | 463 FPS |
| ultra | 390 FPS | 404 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600 and Core i7-13700K

Core i5-13600
Core i5-13600
The Core i5-13600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture. It features 14 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 31,499 points. Launch price was $255.

Core i7-13700K
Core i7-13700K
The Core i7-13700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 45,784 points. Launch price was $409.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600 packs 14 cores / 20 threads, while the Core i7-13700K offers 16 cores / 24 threads — the Core i7-13700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5 GHz on the Core i5-13600 versus 5.4 GHz on the Core i7-13700K — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-13700K (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-13600 uses the Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i7-13700K uses Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600 scores 31,499 against the Core i7-13700K's 45,784 — a 37% lead for the Core i7-13700K. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 21,000 vs 31,000 (38.5% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,900 vs 2,846, a 39.9% lead for the Core i7-13700K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 12,000 vs 18,980 (45.1% advantage for the Core i7-13700K). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Core i5-13600 vs 30 MB (total) on the Core i7-13700K.
| Feature | Core i5-13600 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 20 | 16 / 24+14% |
| Boost Clock | 5 GHz | 5.4 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.4 GHz+26% |
| L3 Cache | 24 MB (total) | 30 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+60% |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022) |
| PassMark | 31,499 | 45,784+45% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 21,000 | 31,000+48% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,900 | 2,846+50% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 12,000 | 18,980+58% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1700 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR5-4800 memory speed. Both support up to 192 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Z790,B760,Z690,B660 (Core i5-13600) and Intel Z790,Intel H770,Intel B760,Intel Z690,Intel H670,Intel B660,Intel H610 (Core i7-13700K).
| Feature | Core i5-13600 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | DDR5-5600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 192 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-13700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13600) vs true (Core i7-13700K). Both include integrated graphics — Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i5-13600) and Intel UHD Graphics 770 (Core i7-13700K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600 targets High-end Productivity Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13600 rivals Ryzen 7 7700; Core i7-13700K rivals Ryzen 9 7900X.
| Feature | Core i5-13600 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | true |
| Target Use | High-end Productivity Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-13600 launched at $255 MSRP, while the Core i7-13700K debuted at $409. On MSRP ($255 vs $409), the Core i5-13600 is $154 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-13600 delivers 123.5 pts/$ vs 111.9 pts/$ for the Core i7-13700K — making the Core i5-13600 the 9.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i5-13600 | Core i7-13700K |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $255-38% | $409 |
| Performance per Dollar | 123.5+10% | 111.9 |
| Release Date | 2023 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












