
Core i5-13600H

Core i9-7920X
Core i5-13600H vs Core i9-7920X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13600H vs Core i9-7920X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13600H vs Core i9-7920X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13600H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +33.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 140W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while Core i9-7920X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,291 vs 23,508).
Core i9-7920X
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,199 MSRP, while Core i5-13600H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌211.1% higher power demand at 140W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600H better than Core i9-7920X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13600H vs Core i9-7920X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13600H
The Core i5-13600H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 23,291 points. Launch price was $311.

Core i9-7920X
The Core i9-7920X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 September 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 23,508 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, matching the Core i9-7920X's 12 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-13600H versus 4.4 GHz on the Core i9-7920X — a 8.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600H (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i5-13600H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Core i9-7920X uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600H scores 23,291 against the Core i9-7920X's 23,508 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i9-7920X. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-13600H vs 16.5 MB (total) on the Core i9-7920X.
| Feature | Core i5-13600H | Core i9-7920X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16 | 12 / 24 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+9% | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 2.9 GHz+4% |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total)+9% | 16.5 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 23,291 | 23,508 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,857 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,423 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,684 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i9-7920X uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13600H | Core i9-7920X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13600H) / not specified (Core i9-7920X). The Core i5-13600H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 80EU), while the Core i9-7920X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600H targets High performance laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13600H rivals Ryzen 7 7840HS.
| Feature | Core i5-13600H | Core i9-7920X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | High performance laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














