
Core i5-13600H

Xeon W-2175
Core i5-13600H vs Xeon W-2175 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i5-13600H vs Xeon W-2175 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i5-13600H vs Xeon W-2175: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i5-13600H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 140W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, while Xeon W-2175 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,291 vs 23,507).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-2175, which brings 14 cores / 28 threads.
Xeon W-2175
2017Why buy it
- ✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 14 cores / 28 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-13600H across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $1,947 MSRP, while Core i5-13600H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌211.1% higher power demand at 140W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core i5-13600H moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-13600H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-13600H better than Xeon W-2175?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-13600H vs Xeon W-2175 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-13600H
The Core i5-13600H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 23,291 points. Launch price was $311.

Xeon W-2175
The Xeon W-2175 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 October 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 23,507 points. Launch price was $1,947.
Processing Power
The Core i5-13600H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-2175 offers 14 cores / 28 threads — the Xeon W-2175 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-13600H versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon W-2175 — a 11% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600H (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-13600H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-2175 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600H scores 23,291 against the Xeon W-2175's 23,507 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon W-2175. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-13600H vs 19.25 MB (total) on the Xeon W-2175.
| Feature | Core i5-13600H | Xeon W-2175 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 16 | 14 / 28+17% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+12% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+12% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 18 MB (total) | 19.25 MB (total)+7% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) |
| PassMark | 23,291 | 23,507 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 14,857 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,423 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 9,684 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-13600H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon W-2175 uses LGA2066 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-13600H | Xeon W-2175 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA2066 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 96 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13600H) / not specified (Xeon W-2175). The Core i5-13600H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 80EU), while the Xeon W-2175 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600H targets High performance laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13600H rivals Ryzen 7 7840HS.
| Feature | Core i5-13600H | Xeon W-2175 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | High performance laptop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














