Core i5-13600H
VS
EPYC 7F32

Core i5-13600H vs EPYC 7F32

Intel

Core i5-13600H

12 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023
VS
AMD

EPYC 7F32

8 Cores16 Thrd180 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13600H

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
122%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
115%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
113%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
107%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
103%
#20
Core i5-13600H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
93%
#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar EPYC 7F32

#458
EPYC 7573X
MSRP: $5590|Avg: $3580
112%
#459
Xeon Platinum 8568Y+
MSRP: $6497|Avg: $6497
111%
#460
Xeon Gold 6242R
MSRP: $2977|Avg: $779
109%
#460
Xeon E5-2686 V3
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $160
109%
#462
Xeon W-2175
MSRP: $1947|Avg: $180
109%
#463
EPYC 75F3
MSRP: $5383|Avg: $2799
108%
#464
Xeon W-3375
MSRP: $4951|Avg: $6000
108%
#466
Xeon Platinum 8358
MSRP: $4607|Avg: $3145
107%
#467
EPYC 7713
MSRP: $7060|Avg: $1299
106%
#467
EPYC 7662
MSRP: $6150|Avg: $1266
106%
#469
EPYC 9554
MSRP: $9087|Avg: $2795
104%
#470
Xeon Gold 6338T
MSRP: $3139|Avg: $1795
103%
#471
Xeon E5-2650 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $45
103%
#472
EPYC 9845
MSRP: $13564|Avg: $8670
102%
#473
EPYC 7F32
MSRP: $2100|Avg: $179
100%
#474
EPYC 9654P
MSRP: $10625|Avg: $5345
99%
#475
EPYC 9965
MSRP: $14813|Avg: $10000
98%
#476
EPYC 9745
MSRP: $12141|Avg: $10588
97%
#477
EPYC 7J13
MSRP: $7890|Avg: $150
97%
#478
EPYC 7702
MSRP: $6450|Avg: $2035
97%
#479
EPYC 7763
MSRP: $7890|Avg: $1513
97%
#480
EPYC 9734
MSRP: $9600|Avg: $6598
96%
#481
Xeon Platinum 8160M
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $350
96%
#482
Xeon 6724P
MSRP: $3622|Avg: $3622
95%
#483
EPYC 9634
MSRP: $10304|Avg: $3949
95%
#484
EPYC 7773X
MSRP: $8800|Avg: $8800
94%
#485
Xeon Gold 6258R
MSRP: $3950|Avg: $1400
93%
#486
EPYC 9175F
MSRP: $4256|Avg: $3703
92%
#488
EPYC 9534
MSRP: $8803|Avg: $2999
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($179) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The EPYC 7F32 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightCore i5-13600HEPYC 7F32
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($179)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Zen 2 (2017−2020) / 7 nm, 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-13600H ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($179 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightCore i5-13600HEPYC 7F32
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($179)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600H and EPYC 7F32

Intel

Core i5-13600H

The Core i5-13600H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 23,291 points. Launch price was $311.

AMD

EPYC 7F32

The EPYC 7F32 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,253 points. Launch price was $2,100.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13600H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 7F32 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-13600H has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-13600H versus 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 7F32 — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-13600H (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i5-13600H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7F32 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600H scores 23,291 against the EPYC 7F32's 23,253 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-13600H. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-13600H vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F32.

FeatureCore i5-13600HEPYC 7F32
Cores / Threads
12 / 16+50%
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz+23%
3.9 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
3.7 GHz+32%
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)
32 MB (total)+78%
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+300%
512 kB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture
Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark
23,291
23,253
Cinebench R23 Multi
14,857
Geekbench 6 Single
2,423
Geekbench 6 Multi
9,684
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13600H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7F32 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-13600HEPYC 7F32
Socket
FCBGA1744
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
96 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13600H) / not specified (EPYC 7F32). The Core i5-13600H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 80EU), while the EPYC 7F32 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600H targets High performance laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13600H rivals Ryzen 7 7840HS.

FeatureCore i5-13600HEPYC 7F32
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
High performance laptop