Core i5-13600H
VS
Ryzen 5 240

Core i5-13600H vs Ryzen 5 240

Intel

Core i5-13600H

12 Cores16 Thrd45 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023
VS
AMD

Ryzen 5 240

6 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 5 GHz2025

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-13600H

#10
Ryzen 7 260
MSRP: $199|Avg: $70
122%
#13
Ryzen 3 210
MSRP: $99|Avg: $99
115%
#14
Ryzen 5 PRO 230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
113%
#15
Ryzen 5 220
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
107%
#18
Ryzen 5 8500G
MSRP: $179|Avg: $150
103%
#20
Core i5-13600H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#27
Core Ultra 7 265HX
MSRP: $450|Avg: N/A
93%
#31
Ryzen 5 230
MSRP: $200|Avg: $190
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Ryzen 5 240 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i5-13600H is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.5% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-13600HRyzen 5 240
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
✨ Modern (Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) / Intel 7 nm)
✨ Modern (Hawk Point (2024−2025) / 4 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-13600HRyzen 5 240
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-13600H and Ryzen 5 240

Intel

Core i5-13600H

The Core i5-13600H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture. It features 12 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 23,291 points. Launch price was $311.

AMD

Ryzen 5 240

The Ryzen 5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,167 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i5-13600H packs 12 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 240 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-13600H has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-13600H versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 240 — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 240 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i5-13600H uses the Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 240 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-13600H scores 23,291 against the Ryzen 5 240's 23,167 — a 0.5% lead for the Core i5-13600H. L3 cache: 18 MB (total) on the Core i5-13600H vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 240.

FeatureCore i5-13600HRyzen 5 240
Cores / Threads
12 / 16+100%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz
5 GHz+4%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
4.3 GHz+54%
L3 Cache
18 MB (total)+13%
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)+100%
1 MB (per core)
Process
Intel 7 nm
4 nm-43%
Architecture
Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark
23,291
23,167
Cinebench R23 Multi
14,857
Geekbench 6 Single
2,423
Geekbench 6 Multi
9,684
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-13600H uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 240 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-13600HRyzen 5 240
Socket
FCBGA1744
FP8
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+25%
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR5-5200, DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
96 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
28
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-13600H) / not specified (Ryzen 5 240). The Core i5-13600H includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics 80EU), while the Ryzen 5 240 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-13600H targets High performance laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-13600H rivals Ryzen 7 7840HS.

FeatureCore i5-13600HRyzen 5 240
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Iris Xe Graphics 80EU
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
High performance laptop