Core i5-14450HX vs EPYC 7F32

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i5-14450HX

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while EPYC 7F32 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).

EPYC 7F32

2020

Why buy it

✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14450HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (23,253 vs 23,557).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,100 MSRP, while Core i5-14450HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i5-14450HX moves to FCBGA1964 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-14450HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-14450HX

2024

EPYC 7F32

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Newer platform on FCBGA1964 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while EPYC 7F32 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+60% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 20 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 32 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-14450HX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (23,253 vs 23,557).
❌Launch MSRP is still $2,100 MSRP, while Core i5-14450HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i5-14450HX moves to FCBGA1964 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-14450HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-14450HX better than EPYC 7F32?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 7F32 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-14450HX is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-14450HX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 8.6% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-14450HX is the better fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-14450HX is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7F32 makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Core i5-14450HX is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $2,100 MSRP, and it gives you a 8.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7F32 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (11.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-14450HX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with FCBGA1964 and DDR5 instead of SP3, more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-14450HX Benchmark Check

EPYC 7F32 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i5-14450HX	EPYC 7F32
1080p
low	252 FPS	193 FPS
medium	242 FPS	158 FPS
high	202 FPS	136 FPS
ultra	173 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	218 FPS	167 FPS
medium	187 FPS	135 FPS
high	151 FPS	111 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	80 FPS
4K
low	151 FPS	69 FPS
medium	129 FPS	58 FPS
high	99 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	87 FPS	37 FPS

Open Core i5-14450HX Open EPYC 7F32

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i5-14450HX	EPYC 7F32
1080p
low	554 FPS	433 FPS
medium	470 FPS	379 FPS
high	393 FPS	309 FPS
ultra	361 FPS	259 FPS
1440p
low	456 FPS	367 FPS
medium	402 FPS	332 FPS
high	345 FPS	277 FPS
ultra	300 FPS	229 FPS
4K
low	278 FPS	236 FPS
medium	246 FPS	215 FPS
high	231 FPS	191 FPS
ultra	203 FPS	159 FPS

Open Core i5-14450HX Open EPYC 7F32

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i5-14450HX	EPYC 7F32
1080p
low	589 FPS	581 FPS
medium	526 FPS	580 FPS
high	466 FPS	541 FPS
ultra	404 FPS	466 FPS
1440p
low	588 FPS	535 FPS
medium	484 FPS	437 FPS
high	423 FPS	401 FPS
ultra	369 FPS	342 FPS
4K
low	433 FPS	383 FPS
medium	371 FPS	300 FPS
high	333 FPS	268 FPS
ultra	284 FPS	213 FPS

Open Core i5-14450HX Open EPYC 7F32

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i5-14450HX	EPYC 7F32
1080p
low	589 FPS	581 FPS
medium	589 FPS	581 FPS
high	589 FPS	581 FPS
ultra	589 FPS	581 FPS
1440p
low	589 FPS	581 FPS
medium	589 FPS	581 FPS
high	588 FPS	564 FPS
ultra	512 FPS	479 FPS
4K
low	531 FPS	519 FPS
medium	486 FPS	468 FPS
high	434 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	378 FPS	357 FPS

Open Core i5-14450HX Open EPYC 7F32

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-14450HX and EPYC 7F32

Core i5-14450HX

The Core i5-14450HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): + 20 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,557 points. Launch price was $299.

EPYC 7F32

The EPYC 7F32 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 23,253 points. Launch price was $2,100.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-14450HX packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 7F32 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i5-14450HX has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-14450HX versus 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 7F32 — a 20.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-14450HX (base: 2.4 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i5-14450HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the EPYC 7F32 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14450HX scores 23,557 against the EPYC 7F32's 23,253 — a 1.3% lead for the Core i5-14450HX. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-14450HX vs 32 MB (total) on the EPYC 7F32.

Feature	Core i5-14450HX	EPYC 7F32
Cores / Threads	10 / 16+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.8 GHz+23%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	3.7 GHz+54%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+60%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)+300%	512 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm	7 nm, 14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024)	Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark	23,557+1%	23,253

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-14450HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7F32 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-14450HX	EPYC 7F32
Socket	FCBGA1964	SP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+25%	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600	—
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-14450HX) / not specified (EPYC 7F32). The Core i5-14450HX includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the EPYC 7F32 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-14450HX targets Mobile.