
Core i5-14450HX
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i5-14450HX
2024Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,227 vs 23,557).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-14450HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i5-14450HX
2024Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (23,227 vs 23,557).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-14450HX can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i5-14450HX better than Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i5-14450HX | Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 252 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 202 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 187 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 151 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 151 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i5-14450HX | Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 554 FPS | 426 FPS |
| medium | 470 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 393 FPS | 314 FPS |
| ultra | 361 FPS | 275 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 371 FPS |
| medium | 402 FPS | 325 FPS |
| high | 345 FPS | 288 FPS |
| ultra | 300 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 278 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 246 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 203 FPS | 187 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i5-14450HX | Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 589 FPS | 581 FPS |
| medium | 526 FPS | 581 FPS |
| high | 466 FPS | 581 FPS |
| ultra | 404 FPS | 581 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 588 FPS | 581 FPS |
| medium | 484 FPS | 581 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 522 FPS |
| ultra | 369 FPS | 446 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 433 FPS | 492 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 431 FPS |
| high | 333 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 284 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i5-14450HX | Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 589 FPS | 581 FPS |
| medium | 589 FPS | 581 FPS |
| high | 589 FPS | 581 FPS |
| ultra | 589 FPS | 581 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 589 FPS | 581 FPS |
| medium | 589 FPS | 581 FPS |
| high | 588 FPS | 581 FPS |
| ultra | 512 FPS | 581 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 531 FPS | 581 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 548 FPS |
| high | 434 FPS | 490 FPS |
| ultra | 378 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-14450HX and Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS

Core i5-14450HX
Core i5-14450HX
The Core i5-14450HX is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture. It features 10 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1964. Thermal design power (TDP): + 20 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,557 points. Launch price was $299.


Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS
Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS
The Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,227 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i5-14450HX packs 10 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-14450HX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Core i5-14450HX versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS — a 4.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS (base: 2.4 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i5-14450HX uses the Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-14450HX scores 23,557 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS's 23,227 — a 1.4% lead for the Core i5-14450HX. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Core i5-14450HX vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS.
| Feature | Core i5-14450HX | Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 16+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz | 5 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 4.3 GHz+79% |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total)+25% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-HX Refresh (2024) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 23,557+1% | 23,227 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-14450HX uses the FCBGA1964 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i5-14450HX | Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1964 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-14450HX) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS). The Core i5-14450HX includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-14450HX targets Mobile.
| Feature | Core i5-14450HX | Ryzen 5 PRO 8645HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Mobile | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











