
Core i5-2400S vs Atom x5-E8000

Core i5-2400S

Atom x5-E8000
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-2400S is positioned at rank 713 and the Atom x5-E8000 is on rank 18, so the Atom x5-E8000 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2400S
Performance Per Dollar Atom x5-E8000
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-2400S | Atom x5-E8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($18) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Cherry Trail (2015−2016) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-2400S | Atom x5-E8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+78%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($10) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($18) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-2400S and Atom x5-E8000

Core i5-2400S
The Core i5-2400S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,187 points. Launch price was $141.

Atom x5-E8000
The Atom x5-E8000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 February 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Cherry Trail (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.04 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,219 points. Launch price was $39.
Processing Power
Both the Core i5-2400S and Atom x5-E8000 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-2400S versus 1.04 GHz on the Atom x5-E8000 — a 104.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-2400S. The Core i5-2400S uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Atom x5-E8000 uses Cherry Trail (2015−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2400S scores 3,187 against the Atom x5-E8000's 3,219 — a 1% lead for the Atom x5-E8000. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2400S vs 0 kB on the Atom x5-E8000.
| Feature | Core i5-2400S | Atom x5-E8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.3 GHz+217% | 1.04 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.5 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 6144 kB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 2 MB+700% |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Cherry Trail (2015−2016) |
| PassMark | 3,187 | 3,219+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,965 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 578 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,966 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. The Core i5-2400S supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-2400S) vs 4 (Atom x5-E8000) — the Core i5-2400S offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H61,H67,P67,Z68,B75,Z77 (Core i5-2400S) and Intel FCBGA1170 (Atom x5-E8000).
| Feature | Core i5-2400S | Atom x5-E8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | — |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 3.0+50% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | DDR3L-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+300% | 4 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Core i5-2400S) / not specified (Atom x5-E8000). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 2000 (Core i5-2400S) and Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) (Atom x5-E8000) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Core i5-2400S | Atom x5-E8000 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 2000 | Intel HD Graphics (Braswell) |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i5-2400S launched at $135 MSRP, while the Atom x5-E8000 debuted at $18.
| Feature | Core i5-2400S | Atom x5-E8000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $135 | $18-87% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | — |
| Release Date | 2011 | 2016 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















