Core i5-2400S vs FX-7500

Core i5-2400S vs FX-7500 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-2400S

4 / 4

3,187

0.0%

3,209

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-2400S vs FX-7500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-2400S vs FX-7500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-2400S

2011

Why buy it

✅100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike FX-7500.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,187 vs 3,209).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.6 vs 32.1 PassMark/$ ($135 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌242.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 19W.

FX-7500

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $35 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
✅Delivers 35.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.1 vs 23.6 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
✅Draws 19W instead of 65W, a 46W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-2400S.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-7500 better than Core i5-2400S?

Yes. FX-7500 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-7500 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-7500 is the better buy right now. FX-7500 comes in $35 cheaper on MSRP at $100 MSRP versus $135 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 35.9% better value on MSRP (32.1 vs 23.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FX-7500 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-2400S vs FX-7500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-2400S

The Core i5-2400S is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,187 points. Launch price was $141.

FX-7500

The FX-7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 June 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 19 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 3,209 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-2400S and FX-7500 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-2400S versus 3.3 GHz on the FX-7500 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i5-2400S uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the FX-7500 uses Kaveri (2014−2015) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2400S scores 3,187 against the FX-7500's 3,209 — a 0.7% lead for the FX-7500.

Feature	Core i5-2400S	FX-7500
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 4
Boost Clock	3.3 GHz	3.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz+19%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	6144 kB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	4096 kB+1500%
Process	32 nm	28 nm-13%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Kaveri (2014−2015)
PassMark	3,187	3,209
Cinebench R23 Multi	1,965	—
Geekbench 6 Single	578	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,966	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2400S uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the FX-7500 uses FP3 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-2400S versus DDR3-1600 on the FX-7500 — the FX-7500 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-2400S supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-2400S) vs 8 (FX-7500) — the Core i5-2400S offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i5-2400S	FX-7500
Socket	LGA1155	FP3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+100%	8

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: Yes (Core i5-2400S) vs AMD-V (FX-7500). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 2000 (Core i5-2400S) and Radeon R7 (FX-7500) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: FX-7500 targets Mobile.

Feature	Core i5-2400S	FX-7500
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 2000	Radeon R7
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	Yes	AMD-V
Target Use	—	Mobile

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i5-2400S was priced at $135, while the FX-7500 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($135 vs $100), FX-7500 was $35 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-2400S delivers 23.6 pts/$ vs 32.1 pts/$ for the FX-7500 — making the FX-7500 the 30.5% better value option.

Feature	Core i5-2400S	FX-7500
MSRP	$135	$100-26%
Performance per Dollar	23.6	32.1+36%
Release Date	2011	2014

Search Core i5-2400S on Amazon

Search FX-7500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.