Core i5-2450M vs Celeron 6305

Core i5-2450M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2012

Celeron 6305

2 Cores2 Thrd2.5 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i5-2450M

2 / 4

2,076

0.0%

2,077

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-2450M is positioned at rank 1100 and the Celeron 6305 is on rank 897, so the Celeron 6305 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2450M

#1088

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

3179%

#1089

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

3132%

#1090

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

2875%

#1091

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

2862%

#1092

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

2836%

#1094

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

2739%

#1095

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

2626%

#1096

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

2622%

#1097

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

2551%

#1100

Core i5-2450M

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

100%

#1101

Core i5-7Y57

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

100%

#1102

Core i5-7Y54

MSRP: $281|Avg: $100

100%

#1104

Pentium 997

MSRP: $134|Avg: $10

98%

#1105

Pentium A1018

MSRP: $132|Avg: $15

98%

#1106

Core i5-2430M

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

97%

#1108

Pentium Dual Core T4500

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

97%

#1109

Celeron B820

MSRP: $86|Avg: $15

96%

#1110

Pentium B980

MSRP: $125|Avg: $35

95%

#1111

Celeron 867

MSRP: $86|Avg: $15

95%

#1112

Pentium B970

MSRP: $125|Avg: $39

95%

#1113

Core i5-2410M

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

94%

#1114

Pentium T2370

MSRP: $86|Avg: $10

94%

#1115

Pentium N3710

MSRP: $161|Avg: $50

93%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 6305

#885

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

1512%

#886

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

1489%

#887

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

1367%

#888

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

1361%

#889

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

1349%

#891

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

1302%

#892

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

1249%

#893

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

1247%

#894

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

1213%

#897

Celeron 6305

MSRP: $107|Avg: $80

100%

#900

Core i7-8705G

MSRP: $400|Avg: $400

98%

#902

Pentium Dual Core T2410

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

98%

#903

FX-8800P

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

97%

#904

Core i7-8809G

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

97%

#911

Core i7-6820HK

MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A

96%

#912

Athlon II Neo K325

MSRP: $60|Avg: $25

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 6305 (2020) utilizes 10 nm SuperFin technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	Core i5-2450M	Celeron 6305
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks	✅ Better multi-core power
Price	⚠️ Higher cost ($225)	✅ More affordable ($80)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)	✨ Modern (Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) / 10 nm SuperFin)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-2450M (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	Core i5-2450M	Celeron 6305
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	✅ Better overall value (+181%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️ Higher cost ($225)	✅ More affordable ($80)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i5-2450M Benchmark Check

Celeron 6305 Benchmark Check

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-2450M and Celeron 6305

Core i5-2450M

The Core i5-2450M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,076 points. Launch price was $823.

Celeron 6305

The Celeron 6305 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 2.5 MB + 4 MB. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,077 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-2450M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron 6305's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-2450M versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 6305 — a 53.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-2450M. The Core i5-2450M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron 6305 uses Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) (10 nm SuperFin). In PassMark, the Core i5-2450M scores 2,076 against the Celeron 6305's 2,077 — a 0% lead for the Celeron 6305. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 453 vs 744, a 48.6% lead for the Celeron 6305 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 871 vs 1,236 (34.6% advantage for the Celeron 6305). L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2450M vs 4 MB on the Celeron 6305.

Feature	Core i5-2450M	Celeron 6305
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz+72%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.5 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	4 MB+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	2.5 MB+900%
Process	32 nm	10 nm SuperFin-69%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021)
PassMark	2,076	2,077
Cinebench R23 Multi	1,352	—
Geekbench 6 Single	453	744+64%
Geekbench 6 Multi	871	1,236+42%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2450M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 6305 uses FCBGA1449 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 1333 on the Core i5-2450M versus DDR4-3200 on the Celeron 6305 — the Core i5-2450M supports 198.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron 6305 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-2450M) vs 4 (Celeron 6305) — the Core i5-2450M offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i5-2450M) and Tiger Lake-U (Celeron 6305).

Feature	Core i5-2450M	Celeron 6305
Socket	PGA988	FCBGA1449
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed	1333+33225%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	16	64 GB+419430300%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	❌	❌
PCIe Lanes	16+300%	4

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: true (Core i5-2450M) vs VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 6305). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics 3000 (Core i5-2450M) and UHD Graphics for 11th Gen (Celeron 6305) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 6305 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Core i5-2450M rivals AMD A8-3500M; Celeron 6305 rivals Pentium Gold 7505.