Core i5-2450M
VS
Core i3-3240T

Core i5-2450M vs Core i3-3240T

Intel

Core i5-2450M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i3-3240T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-2450M is positioned at rank 1100 and the Core i3-3240T is on rank 851, so the Core i3-3240T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2450M

#1088
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3179%
#1089
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3132%
#1090
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2875%
#1091
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2862%
#1092
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2836%
#1094
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2739%
#1095
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2626%
#1096
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2622%
#1097
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2551%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
100%
#1101
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1102
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
100%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
98%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
98%
#1106
Core i5-2430M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1108
Pentium Dual Core T4500
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
97%
#1109
Celeron B820
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
96%
#1110
Pentium B980
MSRP: $125|Avg: $35
95%
#1111
Celeron 867
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
#1112
Pentium B970
MSRP: $125|Avg: $39
95%
#1113
Core i5-2410M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1114
Pentium T2370
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
94%
#1115
Pentium N3710
MSRP: $161|Avg: $50
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-3240T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
17552%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
16584%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12042%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3628%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2873%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2514%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1440%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1421%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1294%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1294%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1279%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1245%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1227%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1222%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1211%
#851
Core i3-3240T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $8
100%
#852
Athlon II X2 240
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
99%
#854
Core i5-2500S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $61
99%
#856
Athlon X2 BE-2400
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
99%
#857
Core i3-2102
MSRP: $117|Avg: $15
98%
#858
Pentium G850
MSRP: $86|Avg: $75
98%
#859
Core i5-3475S
MSRP: $249|Avg: $42
98%
#860
Core i7-2600K
MSRP: $317|Avg: $109
97%
#861
Pentium G860
MSRP: $86|Avg: $36
97%
#862
Athlon II X2 245
MSRP: $66|Avg: $15
97%
#863
Core i7-2700K
MSRP: $332|Avg: $45
97%
#865
Core i5-4670K
MSRP: $328|Avg: $200
96%
#866
Core i5-3330S
MSRP: $231|Avg: $30
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-2450M leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-3240T is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-2450MCore i3-3240T
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($225)
More affordable ($8)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i3-3240T stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 96% cheaper ($8 vs $225) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i5-2450MCore i3-3240T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+2715%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($225)
More affordable ($8)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-2450M and Core i3-3240T

Intel

Core i5-2450M

The Core i5-2450M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,076 points. Launch price was $823.

Intel

Core i3-3240T

The Core i3-3240T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 September 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,078 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-2450M and Core i3-3240T share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-2450M versus 3 GHz on the Core i3-3240T — a 3.3% clock advantage for the Core i5-2450M (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i5-2450M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-3240T uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2450M scores 2,076 against the Core i3-3240T's 2,078 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-3240T. Both processors carry 3 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeatureCore i5-2450MCore i3-3240T
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz+3%
3 GHz
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
2.9 GHz+16%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,076
2,078
Cinebench R23 Multi
1,352
Geekbench 6 Single
453
Geekbench 6 Multi
871
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2450M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-3240T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-2450MCore i3-3240T
Socket
PGA988
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
1333
Max RAM Capacity
16
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i5-2450M) / not specified (Core i3-3240T). The Core i5-2450M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Core i3-3240T requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-2450M rivals AMD A8-3500M.

FeatureCore i5-2450MCore i3-3240T
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-2450M launched at $225 MSRP, while the Core i3-3240T debuted at $117.

FeatureCore i5-2450MCore i3-3240T
MSRP
$225
$117-48%
Avg Price (30d)
$8
Release Date
2012
2012