Core i5-2450M
VS
Core i7-610E

Core i5-2450M vs Core i7-610E

Intel

Core i5-2450M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i7-610E

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-2450M is positioned at rank 1100 and the Core i7-610E is on rank 1125, so the Core i5-2450M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2450M

#1088
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3179%
#1089
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3132%
#1090
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2875%
#1091
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2862%
#1092
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2836%
#1094
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2739%
#1095
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2626%
#1096
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2622%
#1097
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2551%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
100%
#1101
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1102
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
100%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
98%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
98%
#1106
Core i5-2430M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1108
Pentium Dual Core T4500
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
97%
#1109
Celeron B820
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
96%
#1110
Pentium B980
MSRP: $125|Avg: $35
95%
#1111
Celeron 867
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
95%
#1112
Pentium B970
MSRP: $125|Avg: $39
95%
#1113
Core i5-2410M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
94%
#1114
Pentium T2370
MSRP: $86|Avg: $10
94%
#1115
Pentium N3710
MSRP: $161|Avg: $50
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-610E

#1113
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3543%
#1114
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3492%
#1115
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3205%
#1116
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3191%
#1117
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3162%
#1119
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3053%
#1120
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2928%
#1121
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2923%
#1122
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2844%
#1125
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
100%
#1126
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
99%
#1127
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
99%
#1128
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
99%
#1129
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
99%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
99%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
99%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
99%
#1133
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
98%
#1135
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
94%
#1136
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
94%
#1137
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
93%
#1138
Core i7-2820QM
MSRP: $568|Avg: N/A
93%
#1139
Core i5-520M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i7-610E leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i5-2450M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-2450MCore i7-610E
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($225)
More affordable ($40)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Core i7-610E stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 82% cheaper ($40 vs $225) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i5-2450MCore i7-610E
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+461%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($225)
More affordable ($40)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-2450M and Core i7-610E

Intel

Core i5-2450M

The Core i5-2450M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,076 points. Launch price was $823.

Intel

Core i7-610E

The Core i7-610E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.53 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066. Passmark benchmark score: 2,071 points. Launch price was $332.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-2450M and Core i7-610E share an identical 2-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-2450M versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i7-610E — a 3.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-610E (base: 2.5 GHz vs 2.53 GHz). The Core i5-2450M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-610E uses Arrandale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2450M scores 2,076 against the Core i7-610E's 2,071 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-2450M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2450M vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i7-610E.

FeatureCore i5-2450MCore i7-610E
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz
3.2 GHz+3%
Base Clock
2.5 GHz
2.53 GHz+1%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
4 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Arrandale (2010−2011)
PassMark
2,076
2,071
Cinebench R23 Multi
1,352
Geekbench 6 Single
453
Geekbench 6 Multi
871
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2450M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-610E uses BGA1288 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i5-2450MCore i7-610E
Socket
PGA988
BGA1288
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1333
Max RAM Capacity
16
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Core i5-2450M) / not specified (Core i7-610E). The Core i5-2450M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Core i7-610E requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-2450M rivals AMD A8-3500M.

FeatureCore i5-2450MCore i7-610E
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i5-2450M launched at $225 MSRP, while the Core i7-610E debuted at $250.

FeatureCore i5-2450MCore i7-610E
MSRP
$225-10%
$250
Avg Price (30d)
$40
Release Date
2012
2010