Core 2 Quad Q6700 vs Core i5-2450M

Intel

Core 2 Quad Q6700

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.67 GHz2007
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i5-2450M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2012
Similar parts
·······

Core 2 Quad Q6700 vs Core i5-2450M Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core 2 Quad Q6700 vs Core i5-2450M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core 2 Quad Q6700 vs Core i5-2450M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core 2 Quad Q6700

2007

Why buy it

  • +0.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 3.9 vs 9.2 PassMark/$ ($530 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
  • 171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i5-2450M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i5-2450M

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $305 less on MSRP ($225 MSRP vs $530 MSRP).
  • Delivers 133.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 3.9 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $530 MSRP).
  • Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 3000, while Core 2 Quad Q6700 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (2,076 vs 2,092).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-2450M better than Core 2 Quad Q6700?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-2450M is ahead with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Quad Q6700 pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core 2 Quad Q6700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i5-2450M is the better buy right now. Core i5-2450M comes in $305 cheaper on MSRP at $225 MSRP versus $530 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core 2 Quad Q6700 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. It is also 133.8% better value on MSRP (9.2 vs 3.9 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i5-2450M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2012 vs 2007). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core 2 Quad Q6700 vs Core i5-2450M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core 2 Quad Q6700

The Core 2 Quad Q6700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Kentsfield (2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 8 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,092 points. Launch price was $249.

Intel

Core i5-2450M

The Core i5-2450M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,076 points. Launch price was $823.

Processing Power

The Core 2 Quad Q6700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-2450M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core 2 Quad Q6700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Quad Q6700 versus 3.1 GHz on the Core i5-2450M — a 14.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-2450M (base: 2.66 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core 2 Quad Q6700 uses the Kentsfield (2007) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i5-2450M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core 2 Quad Q6700 scores 2,092 against the Core i5-2450M's 2,076 — a 0.8% lead for the Core 2 Quad Q6700. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Core 2 Quad Q6700 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2450M.

FeatureCore 2 Quad Q6700Core i5-2450M
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.67 GHz
3.1 GHz+16%
Base Clock
2.66 GHz+6%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
8 MB (total)
256K (per core)+3100%
Process
65 nm
32 nm-51%
Architecture
Kentsfield (2007)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
2,092
2,076
Cinebench R23 Multi
1,352
Geekbench 6 Single
453
Geekbench 6 Multi
871
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core 2 Quad Q6700 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Core i5-2450M uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Quad Q6700 versus 1333 on the Core i5-2450M — the Core i5-2450M supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-2450M supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 0 (Core 2 Quad Q6700) vs 16 (Core i5-2450M) — the Core i5-2450M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: P45,G45 (Core 2 Quad Q6700) and HM65,HM67,QM67,QS67 (Core i5-2450M).

FeatureCore 2 Quad Q6700Core i5-2450M
Socket
LGA775
PGA988
PCIe Generation
PCIe 1.1
PCIe 2.0+82%
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
1333+67%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
0
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (Core 2 Quad Q6700) vs true (Core i5-2450M). The Core i5-2450M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Core 2 Quad Q6700 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-2450M rivals AMD A8-3500M.

FeatureCore 2 Quad Q6700Core i5-2450M
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
true
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core 2 Quad Q6700 was priced at $530, while the Core i5-2450M came in at $225. On launch pricing ($530 vs $225), Core i5-2450M was $305 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core 2 Quad Q6700 delivers 3.9 pts/$ vs 9.2 pts/$ for the Core i5-2450M — making the Core i5-2450M the 80.2% better value option.

FeatureCore 2 Quad Q6700Core i5-2450M
MSRP
$530
$225-58%
Performance per Dollar
3.9
9.2+136%
Release Date
2007
2012

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.