Core i5-2467M
VS
Core 2 Duo E6550

Core i5-2467M vs Core 2 Duo E6550

Intel

Core i5-2467M

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E6550

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.33 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-2467M is positioned at rank 729 and the Core 2 Duo E6550 is on rank 1022, so the Core i5-2467M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2467M

#717
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1040%
#718
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1025%
#719
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
941%
#720
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
937%
#721
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
928%
#723
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
896%
#724
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
860%
#725
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
858%
#726
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
835%
#729
Core i5-2467M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#744
Pentium 6805
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E6550

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
36415%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
34409%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
24984%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
7527%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5962%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5215%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2987%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2948%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2684%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2684%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2654%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2582%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2546%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2536%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2513%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
90%
#1022
Core 2 Duo E6550
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
100%
#1023
Phenom X3 8450
MSRP: $145|Avg: $147
98%
#1024
Core i7-3960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $60
98%
#1025
Celeron 2.70
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
97%
#1027
A10 PRO-7850B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $140
94%
#1028
Core 2 Quad Q8200
MSRP: $224|Avg: $36
94%
#1029
A12-9800E
MSRP: $426|Avg: $150
94%
#1030
Phenom II X6 1065T
MSRP: $426|Avg: $170
94%
#1031
Celeron 440
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
93%
#1032
A8-3820
MSRP: $280|Avg: $200
91%
#1033
Core i7-860S
MSRP: $299|Avg: $96
91%
#1035
PRO A10-8770E
MSRP: $395|Avg: $210
89%
#1036
Core 2 Duo E4700
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
89%
#1037
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
MSRP: $230|Avg: $20
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core 2 Duo E6550 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i5-2467M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-2467MCore 2 Duo E6550
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-2467MCore 2 Duo E6550
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-2467M and Core 2 Duo E6550

Intel

Core i5-2467M

The Core i5-2467M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,410 points. Launch price was $250.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E6550

The Core 2 Duo E6550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.33 GHz, with boost up to 2.33 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,395 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Core i5-2467M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core 2 Duo E6550's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Core i5-2467M versus 2.33 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6550 — a 1.3% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E6550 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.33 GHz). The Core i5-2467M uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E6550 uses Conroe (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2467M scores 1,410 against the Core 2 Duo E6550's 1,395 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-2467M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-2467M vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E6550.

FeatureCore i5-2467MCore 2 Duo E6550
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.3 GHz
2.33 GHz+1%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2.33 GHz+46%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
4 MB+1500%
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Conroe (2006−2007)
PassMark
1,410+1%
1,395
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2467M uses the BGA1023 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo E6550 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 1333 memory speed. Both support up to 16 of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: HM65,HM67,QM67,QS57,QS67,UM67 (Core i5-2467M) and P35,G31,G33,P45 (Core 2 Duo E6550).

FeatureCore i5-2467MCore 2 Duo E6550
Socket
BGA1023
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
1333
1333
Max RAM Capacity
16
16
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support true virtualization. The Core i5-2467M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 3000), while the Core 2 Duo E6550 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Core i5-2467M rivals Core i5-2410M; Core 2 Duo E6550 rivals Athlon 64 X2 6000+.

FeatureCore i5-2467MCore 2 Duo E6550
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 3000
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
true
true