Core i5-2500K vs Core i7-7567U

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-2500K vs Core i7-7567U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-2500K vs Core i7-7567U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-2500K

2011

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 3000, while Core i7-7567U needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i7-7567U.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $225 MSRP, while Core i7-7567U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌239.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 28W.

Core i7-7567U

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 95W, a 67W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (4,095 vs 4,141).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-2500K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core i5-2500K.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-7567U better than Core i5-2500K?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-7567U is ahead with a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-2500K pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark. Core i5-2500K also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-2500K is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-7567U is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-7567U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $225 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i5-2500K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2011 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (18.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-7567U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-2500K vs Core i7-7567U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-2500K

The Core i5-2500K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,141 points. Launch price was $216.

Core i7-7567U

The Core i7-7567U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,095 points. Launch price was $415.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-2500K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-7567U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i5-2500K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Core i5-2500K versus 4 GHz on the Core i7-7567U — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-7567U (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i5-2500K uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-7567U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2500K scores 4,141 against the Core i7-7567U's 4,095 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i5-2500K. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-2500K vs 4 MB on the Core i7-7567U.

Feature	Core i5-2500K	Core i7-7567U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz	4 GHz+8%
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	3.5 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	6 MB (total)+50%	4 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	4,141+1%	4,095
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,200	—
Geekbench 6 Single	684	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,032	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2500K uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-7567U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-2500K	Core i7-7567U
Socket	LGA1155	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x (Core i5-2500K) / not specified (Core i7-7567U). The Core i5-2500K includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Core i7-7567U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2500K targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-2500K rivals FX-6300.