Core i5-2500T
VS
A10-5800K

Core i5-2500T vs A10-5800K

Intel

Core i5-2500T

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2011
VS
AMD

A10-5800K

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-2500T is positioned at rank 882 and the A10-5800K is on rank 430, so the A10-5800K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2500T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
19373%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
18306%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
13291%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4004%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3172%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2775%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1589%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1568%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1428%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1428%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1412%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1374%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1355%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1349%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1337%
#882
Core i5-2500T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
100%
#884
Athlon II X2 265
MSRP: $83|Avg: $15
99%
#885
Core i3-2100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $10
99%
#886
A8-3800
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
98%
#887
Pentium E5200
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
97%
#888
Athlon II X2 235e
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
97%
#889
Athlon II X2 250e
MSRP: $77|Avg: $15
97%
#890
Core i7-2600S
MSRP: $297|Avg: $99
97%
#891
Athlon II X2 250u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
97%
#892
Pentium G6951
MSRP: $89|Avg: $50
97%
#893
Core i3-2125
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
97%
#895
Celeron G1820
MSRP: $110|Avg: $15
96%
#896
Celeron E1600
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
96%
#897
Athlon II X2 270u
MSRP: $68|Avg: $10
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A10-5800K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6313%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5965%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4331%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1305%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1033%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
904%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
518%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
511%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
465%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
465%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
460%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
448%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
441%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
440%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
436%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
100%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
99%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
99%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
95%
#348
Athlon PRO 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $81
95%
#349
Core i5-9600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $219
95%
#350
Core i3-8300
MSRP: $138|Avg: $136
95%
#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
94%
#430
A10-5800K
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#434
Core i3-7320
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
99%
#435
Celeron G3930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $39
98%
#436
Ryzen 5 1500X
MSRP: $189|Avg: $67
97%
#444
Pentium G4560T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $20
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-2500T leads in gaming performance. However, the A10-5800K is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-2500TA10-5800K
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-2500TA10-5800K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-2500T and A10-5800K

Intel

Core i5-2500T

The Core i5-2500T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,929 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

A10-5800K

The A10-5800K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,963 points. Launch price was $122.

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-2500T and A10-5800K share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-2500T versus 4.2 GHz on the A10-5800K — a 24% clock advantage for the A10-5800K (base: 2.3 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i5-2500T uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the A10-5800K uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2500T scores 2,929 against the A10-5800K's 2,963 — a 1.2% lead for the A10-5800K. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2500T vs 0 kB on the A10-5800K.

FeatureCore i5-2500TA10-5800K
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
4.2 GHz+27%
Base Clock
2.3 GHz
3.8 GHz+65%
L3 Cache
6144 kB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+300%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,929
2,963+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
461
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2500T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the A10-5800K uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1333 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore i5-2500TA10-5800K
Socket
LGA1155
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A10-5800K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-2500T) vs AMD-V (A10-5800K). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 2000 (Core i5-2500T) and Radeon HD 7660D (A10-5800K) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2500T targets Desktop, A10-5800K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-5800K rivals Core i3-3225.

FeatureCore i5-2500TA10-5800K
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 2000
Radeon HD 7660D
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop
Budget