Core i5-2500T
VS
Athlon Silver 3050U

Core i5-2500T vs Athlon Silver 3050U

Intel

Core i5-2500T

4 Cores4 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2011
VS
AMD

Athlon Silver 3050U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-2500T is positioned at rank 882 and the Athlon Silver 3050U is on rank 456, so the Athlon Silver 3050U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2500T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
19373%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
18306%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
13291%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4004%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3172%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2775%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1589%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1568%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1428%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1428%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1412%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1374%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1355%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1349%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1337%
#882
Core i5-2500T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
100%
#884
Athlon II X2 265
MSRP: $83|Avg: $15
99%
#885
Core i3-2100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $10
99%
#886
A8-3800
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
98%
#887
Pentium E5200
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
97%
#888
Athlon II X2 235e
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
97%
#889
Athlon II X2 250e
MSRP: $77|Avg: $15
97%
#890
Core i7-2600S
MSRP: $297|Avg: $99
97%
#891
Athlon II X2 250u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
97%
#892
Pentium G6951
MSRP: $89|Avg: $50
97%
#893
Core i3-2125
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
97%
#895
Celeron G1820
MSRP: $110|Avg: $15
96%
#896
Celeron E1600
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
96%
#897
Athlon II X2 270u
MSRP: $68|Avg: $10
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon Silver 3050U

#144
Core i7-12650H
MSRP: $457|Avg: N/A
97%
#444
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
597%
#445
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
588%
#446
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
540%
#447
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
537%
#448
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
532%
#450
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
514%
#451
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
493%
#452
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
492%
#453
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
479%
#456
Athlon Silver 3050U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Athlon Silver 3050U (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-2500TAthlon Silver 3050U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Dali (Zen) (2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-2500T (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-2500TAthlon Silver 3050U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($30)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-2500T and Athlon Silver 3050U

Intel

Core i5-2500T

The Core i5-2500T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 9 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,929 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Athlon Silver 3050U

The Athlon Silver 3050U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Dali (Zen) (2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,950 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i5-2500T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon Silver 3050U offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core i5-2500T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-2500T versus 3.2 GHz on the Athlon Silver 3050U — a 3.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-2500T (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Core i5-2500T uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon Silver 3050U uses Dali (Zen) (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-2500T scores 2,929 against the Athlon Silver 3050U's 2,950 — a 0.7% lead for the Athlon Silver 3050U. L3 cache: 6144 kB (total) on the Core i5-2500T vs 4 MB (total) on the Athlon Silver 3050U.

FeatureCore i5-2500TAthlon Silver 3050U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz+3%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.3 GHz+5%
2.2 GHz
L3 Cache
6144 kB (total)+50%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Dali (Zen) (2020)
PassMark
2,929
2,950
Cinebench R23 Multi
900
Geekbench 6 Single
873
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,524
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-2500T uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon Silver 3050U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Core i5-2500T versus DDR4-2400 on the Athlon Silver 3050U — the Athlon Silver 3050U supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-2500T) vs 8 (Athlon Silver 3050U) — the Core i5-2500T offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i5-2500TAthlon Silver 3050U
Socket
LGA1155
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR4-2400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+100%
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-2500T) vs AMD-V (Athlon Silver 3050U). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 2000 (Core i5-2500T) and Radeon Vega 3 (Athlon Silver 3050U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-2500T targets Desktop, Athlon Silver 3050U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Athlon Silver 3050U rivals Pentium Gold 7505.

FeatureCore i5-2500TAthlon Silver 3050U
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 2000
Radeon Vega 3
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop
Budget