Core i5-3340M vs Xeon E5-2403 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-3340M vs Xeon E5-2403 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-3340M vs Xeon E5-2403 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-3340M

2013

Why buy it

✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4000, while Xeon E5-2403 v2 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2403 v2, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads and 24 PCIe lanes.
❌540% higher power demand at 512W vs 80W.

Xeon E5-2403 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅+233.3% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads, plus 24 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Draws 80W instead of 512W, a 432W reduction.
✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,672 vs 2,692).
❌Launch MSRP is still $192 MSRP, while Core i5-3340M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-3340M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-3340M better than Xeon E5-2403 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2403 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-3340M is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-3340M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-3340M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-3340M is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2403 v2 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i5-3340M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $192 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2403 v2 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (13.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2403 v2 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Core i5-3340M vs Xeon E5-2403 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-3340M

The Core i5-3340M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,692 points. Launch price was $225.

Xeon E5-2403 v2

The Xeon E5-2403 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,672 points. Launch price was $223.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-3340M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Xeon E5-2403 v2 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-2403 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-3340M versus 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2403 v2 — a 61.5% clock advantage for the Core i5-3340M (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i5-3340M uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2403 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-3340M scores 2,692 against the Xeon E5-2403 v2's 2,672 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-3340M. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3340M vs 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2403 v2.

Feature	Core i5-3340M	Xeon E5-2403 v2
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+89%	1.8 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+50%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB (total)	10 MB (total)+233%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)
PassMark	2,692	2,672

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-3340M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2403 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 memory speed. The Xeon E5-2403 v2 supports up to 384 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 1100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i5-3340M) vs 3 (Xeon E5-2403 v2). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-3340M) vs 24 (Xeon E5-2403 v2) — the Xeon E5-2403 v2 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i5-3340M	Xeon E5-2403 v2
Socket	PGA988	LGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	384 GB+1100%
RAM Channels	2	3+50%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	24+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i5-3340M) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2403 v2). The Core i5-3340M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4000), while the Xeon E5-2403 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-3340M targets Professional Laptop, Xeon E5-2403 v2 targets Server. Direct competitor: Core i5-3340M rivals AMD A10-4600M.

Feature	Core i5-3340M	Xeon E5-2403 v2
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics 4000	—
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x / VT-d / EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Professional Laptop	Server