Core i5-4200H vs Core i7-860

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4200H vs Core i7-860 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4200H vs Core i7-860: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4200H

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Core i7-860 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-860 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 8 MB).
❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.

Core i7-860

2009

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).
✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,011 vs 3,036).
❌Launch MSRP is still $284 MSRP, while Core i5-4200H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4200H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-860 better than Core i5-4200H?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i7-860 is ahead with a 9.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4200H pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark. Core i7-860 also has the bigger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (8 MB vs 3 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4200H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-860 is the better buy right now. Core i7-860 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $284 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Core i5-4200H is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4200H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2009) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-4200H vs Core i7-860 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4200H

The Core i5-4200H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,036 points. Launch price was $257.

Core i7-860

The Core i7-860 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Lynnfield (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.46 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,011 points. Launch price was $229.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4200H packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i7-860 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-860 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-4200H versus 3.46 GHz on the Core i7-860 — a 1.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-860 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-4200H uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i7-860 uses Lynnfield (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4200H scores 3,036 against the Core i7-860's 3,011 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-4200H. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-4200H vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-860.

Feature	Core i5-4200H	Core i7-860
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.46 GHz+2%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	8 MB (total)+167%
L2 Cache	512 kB+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-51%	45 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Lynnfield (2009−2010)
PassMark	3,036	3,011
Geekbench 6 Single	990	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,927	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4200H uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i7-860 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4200H	Core i7-860
Socket	BGA1364	LGA1156
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-4200H) / not specified (Core i7-860). The Core i5-4200H includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Core i7-860 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4200H targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-4200H rivals Core i7-4500U.