Core i5-4200H vs Opteron X3418

Core i5-4200H vs Opteron X3418 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-4200H

2 / 4

3,036

0.0%

3,043

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4200H vs Opteron X3418 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4200H vs Opteron X3418: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4200H

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while Opteron X3418 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Opteron X3418 across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,036 vs 3,043).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron X3418, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads.
❌3313.3% higher power demand at 512W vs 15W.

Opteron X3418

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads.
✅Draws 15W instead of 512W, a 497W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4200H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Opteron X3418 better than Core i5-4200H?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Opteron X3418 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i5-4200H is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Opteron X3418 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.1% more average FPS across 41 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Opteron X3418 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Opteron X3418 still makes the most sense overall. Opteron X3418 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 41 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Opteron X3418 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-4200H vs Opteron X3418 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4200H

The Core i5-4200H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,036 points. Launch price was $257.

Opteron X3418

The Opteron X3418 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Excavator (2017−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,043 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4200H packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Opteron X3418 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Opteron X3418 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-4200H versus 3.2 GHz on the Opteron X3418 — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-4200H (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i5-4200H uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Opteron X3418 uses Excavator (2017−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4200H scores 3,036 against the Opteron X3418's 3,043 — a 0.2% lead for the Opteron X3418.

Feature	Core i5-4200H	Opteron X3418
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+6%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz+56%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	3 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	2 MB (total)+300%
Process	22 nm-21%	28 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Excavator (2017−2018)
PassMark	3,036	3,043
Geekbench 6 Single	990	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,927	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4200H uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron X3418 uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4200H	Opteron X3418
Socket	BGA1364	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-4200H) / not specified (Opteron X3418). The Core i5-4200H includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the Opteron X3418 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4200H targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-4200H rivals Core i7-4500U.