Core i5-4200H vs PRO A10-8750B

Core i5-4200H vs PRO A10-8750B Performance Spectrum

Core i5-4200H

2 / 4

3,036

0.0%

3,058

+0.7%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4200H vs PRO A10-8750B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4200H vs PRO A10-8750B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4200H

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while PRO A10-8750B needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than PRO A10-8750B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,036 vs 3,058).
❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.

PRO A10-8750B

2015

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4200H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A10-8750B better than Core i5-4200H?

Yes. PRO A10-8750B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, PRO A10-8750B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, PRO A10-8750B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A10-8750B still makes the most sense overall. PRO A10-8750B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A10-8750B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-4200H vs PRO A10-8750B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4200H

The Core i5-4200H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,036 points. Launch price was $257.

PRO A10-8750B

The PRO A10-8750B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,058 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4200H packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the PRO A10-8750B offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the PRO A10-8750B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-4200H versus 4 GHz on the PRO A10-8750B — a 16.2% clock advantage for the PRO A10-8750B (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i5-4200H uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the PRO A10-8750B uses Godaveri (2014−2016) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4200H scores 3,036 against the PRO A10-8750B's 3,058 — a 0.7% lead for the PRO A10-8750B.

Feature	Core i5-4200H	PRO A10-8750B
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	4 GHz+18%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.6 GHz+29%
L3 Cache	3 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	4096 kB+700%
Process	22 nm-21%	28 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Godaveri (2014−2016)
PassMark	3,036	3,058
Geekbench 6 Single	990	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,927	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4200H uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A10-8750B uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4200H	PRO A10-8750B
Socket	BGA1364	FM2+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-4200H) / not specified (PRO A10-8750B). The Core i5-4200H includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the PRO A10-8750B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4200H targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-4200H rivals Core i7-4500U.