Core i5-4200H vs PRO A12-8870E

Core i5-4200H vs PRO A12-8870E Performance Spectrum

Core i5-4200H

2 / 4

3,036

+0.9%

3,010

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 1950

Ryzen AI Max 390

Ryzen 9 9955HX3D

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4200H vs PRO A12-8870E FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4200H vs PRO A12-8870E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4200H

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 4600, while PRO A12-8870E needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.

PRO A12-8870E

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,010 vs 3,036).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4200H can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is PRO A12-8870E better than Core i5-4200H?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, PRO A12-8870E is ahead with a 2.7% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4200H pulls ahead with 0.9% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4200H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

PRO A12-8870E still makes the most sense overall. PRO A12-8870E comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.7% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A12-8870E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-4200H vs PRO A12-8870E Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4200H

The Core i5-4200H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,036 points. Launch price was $257.

PRO A12-8870E

The PRO A12-8870E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,010 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4200H packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the PRO A12-8870E offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the PRO A12-8870E has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i5-4200H versus 3.8 GHz on the PRO A12-8870E — a 11.1% clock advantage for the PRO A12-8870E (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Core i5-4200H uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the PRO A12-8870E uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4200H scores 3,036 against the PRO A12-8870E's 3,010 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-4200H.

Feature	Core i5-4200H	PRO A12-8870E
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	3.8 GHz+12%
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	2.9 GHz+4%
L3 Cache	3 MB	—
L2 Cache	512 kB	2048 kB+300%
Process	22 nm-21%	28 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	3,036	3,010
Geekbench 6 Single	990	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,927	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4200H uses the BGA1364 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A12-8870E uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4200H	PRO A12-8870E
Socket	BGA1364	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-4200H) / not specified (PRO A12-8870E). The Core i5-4200H includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4600), while the PRO A12-8870E requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4200H targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Core i5-4200H rivals Core i7-4500U.