Core i5-4200U
VS
A8-3820

Core i5-4200U vs A8-3820

Intel

Core i5-4200U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2013
VS
AMD

A8-3820

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-4200U is positioned at rank 243 and the A8-3820 is on rank 1032, so the Core i5-4200U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4200U

#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
99%
#231
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
405%
#232
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
399%
#233
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
366%
#234
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
364%
#235
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
361%
#237
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
349%
#238
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
334%
#239
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
334%
#240
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
325%
#243
Core i5-4200U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A8-3820

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
40066%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
37859%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
27488%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8281%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6560%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5738%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3287%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3244%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2953%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2953%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2920%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2841%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2802%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2790%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2765%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
99%
#1032
A8-3820
MSRP: $280|Avg: $200
100%
#1033
Core i7-860S
MSRP: $299|Avg: $96
100%
#1035
Core 2 Duo E4700
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
98%
#1036
PRO A10-8770E
MSRP: $395|Avg: $210
98%
#1037
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
MSRP: $230|Avg: $20
98%
#1038
Phenom II X2 B53
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
97%
#1039
Core 2 Quad Q9300
MSRP: $266|Avg: $27
97%
#1040
Core 2 Duo E7200
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
97%
#1041
Athlon II X4 638
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
97%
#1043
Phenom X3 8750
MSRP: $195|Avg: $20
95%
#1044
Pentium G4400TE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
94%
#1045
Celeron 2.60
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
93%
#1046
Core i7-990X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $225
92%
#1047
Phenom X4 9750B
MSRP: $215|Avg: $34
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Core i5-4200U leads in gaming performance. However, the A8-3820 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-4200UA8-3820
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-4200UA8-3820
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($200)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-4200U and A8-3820

Intel

Core i5-4200U

The Core i5-4200U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,176 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

A8-3820

The A8-3820 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,178 points. Launch price was $90.

Processing Power

The Core i5-4200U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the A8-3820 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the A8-3820 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core i5-4200U versus 2.8 GHz on the A8-3820 — a 7.4% clock advantage for the A8-3820 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i5-4200U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the A8-3820 uses Llano (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4200U scores 2,176 against the A8-3820's 2,178 — a 0.1% lead for the A8-3820. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 733 vs 354, a 69.7% lead for the Core i5-4200U that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-4200U vs 0 kB on the A8-3820.

FeatureCore i5-4200UA8-3820
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz
2.8 GHz+8%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2.5 GHz+56%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB (per core)+300%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Llano (2011−2012)
PassMark
2,176
2,178
Geekbench 6 Single
733+107%
354
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4200U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A8-3820 uses FM1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1600 memory speed. The A8-3820 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i5-4200U) vs 20 (A8-3820) — the A8-3820 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM86,HM87,QM87 (Core i5-4200U) and A55,A75 (A8-3820).

FeatureCore i5-4200UA8-3820
Socket
FCBGA1168
FM1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
20+67%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-4200U) vs AMD-V (A8-3820). Both include integrated graphics HD Graphics 4400 (Core i5-4200U) and Radeon HD 6550D (A8-3820) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4200U targets Thin & Light Laptop, A8-3820 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-4200U rivals A6-5350M; A8-3820 rivals Core i3-2120.

FeatureCore i5-4200UA8-3820
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4400
Radeon HD 6550D
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
Thin & Light Laptop
Budget Desktop