Core i5-4200U
VS
Athlon II X4 630

Core i5-4200U vs Athlon II X4 630

Intel

Core i5-4200U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2013
VS
AMD

Athlon II X4 630

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-4200U is positioned at rank 243 and the Athlon II X4 630 is on rank 868, so the Core i5-4200U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4200U

#64
Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
MSRP: $600|Avg: $600
99%
#231
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
405%
#232
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
399%
#233
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
366%
#234
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
364%
#235
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
361%
#237
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
349%
#238
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
334%
#239
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
334%
#240
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
325%
#243
Core i5-4200U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 630

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
18488%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
17470%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
12684%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3821%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3027%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2648%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1517%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1497%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1363%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1363%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1348%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1311%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1293%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1288%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1276%
#298
Core i9-7960X
MSRP: $1699|Avg: $185
98%
#868
Athlon II X4 630
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
100%
#869
A6-7400K
MSRP: $101|Avg: $43
99%
#870
Core i7-4765T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
98%
#871
Core i7-4770TE
MSRP: $303|Avg: $303
98%
#872
Core i5-4570T
MSRP: $195|Avg: $45
98%
#873
Athlon II X2 260u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
98%
#875
A4-3420
MSRP: $65|Avg: $30
97%
#876
Core i5-5675R
MSRP: $339|Avg: $392
97%
#877
Pentium G3470
MSRP: $150|Avg: $130
97%
#878
Core i5-3335S
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
97%
#879
Core i5-3470T
MSRP: $184|Avg: $35
97%
#881
Pentium G6960
MSRP: $89|Avg: $15
95%
#882
Core i5-2500T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Athlon II X4 630 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i5-4200U is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCore i5-4200UAthlon II X4 630
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Propus (2009−2011) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-4200UAthlon II X4 630
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-4200U and Athlon II X4 630

Intel

Core i5-4200U

The Core i5-4200U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,176 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Athlon II X4 630

The Athlon II X4 630 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 September 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,175 points. Launch price was $63.

Processing Power

The Core i5-4200U packs 2 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X4 630 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 630 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Core i5-4200U versus 2.8 GHz on the Athlon II X4 630 — a 7.4% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 630 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i5-4200U uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Athlon II X4 630 uses Propus (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4200U scores 2,176 against the Athlon II X4 630's 2,175 — a 0% lead for the Core i5-4200U. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-4200U vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 630.

FeatureCore i5-4200UAthlon II X4 630
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock
2.6 GHz
2.8 GHz+8%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2.8 GHz+75%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB (per core)+100%
Process
22 nm-51%
45 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Propus (2009−2011)
PassMark
2,176
2,175
Geekbench 6 Single
733
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4200U uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X4 630 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i5-4200U) vs 16 (Athlon II X4 630) — the Athlon II X4 630 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM86,HM87,QM87 (Core i5-4200U) and Socket AM3 (Athlon II X4 630).

FeatureCore i5-4200UAthlon II X4 630
Socket
FCBGA1168
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
16+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon II X4 630 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-4200U) vs AMD-V (Athlon II X4 630). The Core i5-4200U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 4400), while the Athlon II X4 630 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4200U targets Thin & Light Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i5-4200U rivals A6-5350M.

FeatureCore i5-4200UAthlon II X4 630
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 4400
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
Thin & Light Laptop