Core i5-4202Y
VS
Celeron G1610

Core i5-4202Y vs Celeron G1610

Intel

Core i5-4202Y

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron G1610

2 Cores2 Thrd55 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-4202Y is positioned at rank 964 and the Celeron G1610 is on rank 531, so the Celeron G1610 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4202Y

#952
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1890%
#953
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1863%
#954
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1710%
#955
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1702%
#956
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1687%
#958
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1629%
#959
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1562%
#960
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1559%
#961
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1517%
#964
Core i5-4202Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#968
Core i7-4710MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
99%
#970
Celeron T3100
MSRP: $62|Avg: $62
98%
#971
Core i7-4800MQ
MSRP: $380|Avg: $378
98%
#977
Phenom II X2 N640
MSRP: $100|Avg: $55
97%
#978
A10-8700P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1610

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8448%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7982%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5796%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1746%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1383%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1210%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
693%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
684%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
623%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
623%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
616%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
599%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
591%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
588%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
583%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
96%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
94%
#531
Celeron G1610
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
100%
#532
Core i3-7100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $40
100%
#533
Celeron G1620T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $15
99%
#536
Pentium G4400T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $75
98%
#539
Athlon X4 850
MSRP: $77|Avg: $20
97%
#541
FX-6350
MSRP: $132|Avg: $55
95%
#542
Celeron G470
MSRP: $35|Avg: $10
95%
#543
Pentium G3220
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
95%
#545
Athlon 5370
MSRP: $55|Avg: $15
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-4202Y delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Celeron G1610 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.1% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i5-4202YCeleron G1610
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCore i5-4202YCeleron G1610
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-4202Y and Celeron G1610

Intel

Core i5-4202Y

The Core i5-4202Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,552 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron G1610

The Celeron G1610 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 December 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,550 points. Launch price was $388.

Processing Power

The Core i5-4202Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron G1610's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core i5-4202Y versus 2.6 GHz on the Celeron G1610 — a 26.1% clock advantage for the Celeron G1610 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i5-4202Y uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron G1610 uses Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4202Y scores 1,552 against the Celeron G1610's 1,550 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-4202Y. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 589 vs 456, a 25.5% lead for the Core i5-4202Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,030 vs 778 (27.9% advantage for the Core i5-4202Y). L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-4202Y vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1610.

FeatureCore i5-4202YCeleron G1610
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.6 GHz+30%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2.6 GHz+63%
L3 Cache
3 MB+50%
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,552
1,550
Geekbench 6 Single
589+29%
456
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,030+32%
778
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4202Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G1610 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1600 / LPDDR3-1600 memory speed. The Celeron G1610 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i5-4202Y) vs 16 (Celeron G1610) — the Celeron G1610 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM86,HM87 (Core i5-4202Y) and H61,B75,H77,Z77 (Celeron G1610).

FeatureCore i5-4202YCeleron G1610
Socket
FCBGA1168
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600 / LPDDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
16+33%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x / EPT (Core i5-4202Y) vs VT-x (Celeron G1610). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 4200 (Core i5-4202Y) and HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (Celeron G1610) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4202Y targets Ultra-portable, Celeron G1610 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G1610 rivals Pentium G2020.

FeatureCore i5-4202YCeleron G1610
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4200
HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x / EPT
VT-x
Target Use
Ultra-portable
Budget