
Core i5-4202Y

Core 2 Duo E7300
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-4202Y is positioned at rank 964 and the Core 2 Duo E7300 is on rank 969, so the Core i5-4202Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4202Y
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E7300
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-4202Y | Core 2 Duo E7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($133) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-4202Y | Core 2 Duo E7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($133) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-4202Y and Core 2 Duo E7300

Core i5-4202Y
The Core i5-4202Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,552 points. Launch price was $69.

Core 2 Duo E7300
The Core 2 Duo E7300 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.66 GHz, with boost up to 2.67 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 3 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,555 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The Core i5-4202Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Core 2 Duo E7300's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core i5-4202Y versus 2.67 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E7300 — a 28.7% clock advantage for the Core 2 Duo E7300 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2.66 GHz). The Core i5-4202Y uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E7300 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4202Y scores 1,552 against the Core 2 Duo E7300's 1,555 — a 0.2% lead for the Core 2 Duo E7300. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 589 vs 412, a 35.4% lead for the Core i5-4202Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,030 vs 725 (34.8% advantage for the Core i5-4202Y). L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-4202Y vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo E7300.
| Feature | Core i5-4202Y | Core 2 Duo E7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2.67 GHz+34% |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | 2.66 GHz+66% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 3 MB (total)+500% |
| Process | 22 nm-51% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,552 | 1,555 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 589+43% | 412 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,030+42% | 725 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-4202Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E7300 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 / LPDDR3-1600 on the Core i5-4202Y versus DDR2-800 on the Core 2 Duo E7300 — the Core i5-4202Y supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-4202Y supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i5-4202Y) vs 16 (Core 2 Duo E7300) — the Core 2 Duo E7300 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM86,HM87 (Core i5-4202Y) and P35,G33,G41,P45 (Core 2 Duo E7300).
| Feature | Core i5-4202Y | Core 2 Duo E7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1168 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 / LPDDR3-1600+50% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 16+33% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core 2 Duo E7300 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x / EPT (Core i5-4202Y) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo E7300). The Core i5-4202Y includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4200), while the Core 2 Duo E7300 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4202Y targets Ultra-portable, Core 2 Duo E7300 targets Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core 2 Duo E7300 rivals Athlon II X2 245.
| Feature | Core i5-4202Y | Core 2 Duo E7300 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4200 | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x / EPT | VT-x |
| Target Use | Ultra-portable | Legacy Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















