Core i5-4202Y
VS
Celeron J4005

Core i5-4202Y vs Celeron J4005

Intel

Core i5-4202Y

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron J4005

2 Cores2 Thrd10 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-4202Y is positioned at rank 964 and the Celeron J4005 is on rank 417, so the Celeron J4005 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4202Y

#952
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1890%
#953
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1863%
#954
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1710%
#955
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1702%
#956
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1687%
#958
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1629%
#959
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1562%
#960
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1559%
#961
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1517%
#964
Core i5-4202Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#968
Core i7-4710MQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
99%
#970
Celeron T3100
MSRP: $62|Avg: $62
98%
#971
Core i7-4800MQ
MSRP: $380|Avg: $378
98%
#977
Phenom II X2 N640
MSRP: $100|Avg: $55
97%
#978
A10-8700P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron J4005

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6061%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5727%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4158%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1253%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
992%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
868%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
497%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
491%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
447%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
447%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
442%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
430%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
424%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
422%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
418%
#341
Ryzen Embedded V2748
MSRP: $309|Avg: $359
100%
#342
Core i3-9350K
MSRP: $184|Avg: $150
98%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
97%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
96%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
96%
#417
Celeron J4005
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#419
Celeron G3900
MSRP: $42|Avg: $39
100%
#420
Celeron G1840
MSRP: $35|Avg: $30
99%
#421
Core i5-8400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $95
99%
#423
Phenom II X3 705e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $69
98%
#427
Core 2 Duo E8500
MSRP: $26|Avg: $26
97%
#429
Xeon E5-2618L v4
MSRP: $779|Avg: $33
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron J4005 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i5-4202YCeleron J4005
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Goldmont Plus (2017) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i5-4202Y (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i5-4202YCeleron J4005
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-4202Y and Celeron J4005

Intel

Core i5-4202Y

The Core i5-4202Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,552 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron J4005

The Celeron J4005 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,543 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

The Core i5-4202Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Celeron J4005's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Core i5-4202Y versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron J4005 — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Celeron J4005 (base: 1.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i5-4202Y uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron J4005 uses Goldmont Plus (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4202Y scores 1,552 against the Celeron J4005's 1,543 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i5-4202Y. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 589 vs 450, a 26.8% lead for the Core i5-4202Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,030 vs 800 (25.1% advantage for the Core i5-4202Y). L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-4202Y vs 4 MB on the Celeron J4005.

FeatureCore i5-4202YCeleron J4005
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz
2.7 GHz+35%
Base Clock
1.6 GHz
2 GHz+25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
4 MB+33%
L2 Cache
512 kB
4 MB (total)+700%
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Haswell (2013−2015)
Goldmont Plus (2017)
PassMark
1,552
1,543
Geekbench 6 Single
589+31%
450
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,030+29%
800
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4202Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron J4005 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 / LPDDR3-1600 on the Core i5-4202Y versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron J4005 — the Celeron J4005 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-4202Y supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i5-4202Y) vs 6 (Celeron J4005) — the Core i5-4202Y offers 6 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM86,HM87 (Core i5-4202Y) and SoC (Celeron J4005).

FeatureCore i5-4202YCeleron J4005
Socket
FCBGA1168
FCBGA1090
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600 / LPDDR3-1600
DDR4-2400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12+100%
6
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x / EPT (Core i5-4202Y) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron J4005). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics 4200 (Core i5-4202Y) and Intel UHD Graphics 600 (Celeron J4005) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4202Y targets Ultra-portable, Celeron J4005 targets Entry Level Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron J4005 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1102G.

FeatureCore i5-4202YCeleron J4005
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 4200
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x / EPT
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Ultra-portable
Entry Level Desktop