Core i5-4302Y vs Athlon 64 X2 5400+
Core i5-4302Y
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-4302Y is positioned at rank 201 and the Athlon 64 X2 5400+ is on rank 1091, so the Core i5-4302Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4302Y
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 5400+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Core i5-4302Y | Athlon 64 X2 5400+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($78) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Core i5-4302Y | Athlon 64 X2 5400+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($78) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-4302Y and Athlon 64 X2 5400+
Core i5-4302Y
The Core i5-4302Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,580 points. Launch price was $281.
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
The Athlon 64 X2 5400+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,585 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i5-4302Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Athlon 64 X2 5400+'s 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Core i5-4302Y versus 2.8 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 5400+ — a 19.6% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 5400+. The Core i5-4302Y uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Athlon 64 X2 5400+ uses Windsor (2006−2007) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4302Y scores 1,580 against the Athlon 64 X2 5400+'s 1,585 — a 0.3% lead for the Athlon 64 X2 5400+. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-4302Y vs 0 kB on the Athlon 64 X2 5400+.
| Feature | Core i5-4302Y | Athlon 64 X2 5400+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 4 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.3 GHz | 2.8 GHz+22% |
| Base Clock | 1.6 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB | 512 kB |
| Process | 22 nm-76% | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell (2013−2015) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
| PassMark | 1,580 | 1,585 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 676 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 1,086 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i5-4302Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon 64 X2 5400+ uses AM2 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1600 / LPDDR3-1600 on the Core i5-4302Y versus DDR2-800 on the Athlon 64 X2 5400+ — the Core i5-4302Y supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 12 (Core i5-4302Y) vs 0 (Athlon 64 X2 5400+) — the Core i5-4302Y offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM86,HM87 (Core i5-4302Y) and AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 5400+).
| Feature | Core i5-4302Y | Athlon 64 X2 5400+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1168 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1600 / LPDDR3-1600+50% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 12 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i5-4302Y) / not specified (Athlon 64 X2 5400+). The Core i5-4302Y includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4200), while the Athlon 64 X2 5400+ requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4302Y targets Productivity.
| Feature | Core i5-4302Y | Athlon 64 X2 5400+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics 4200 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x / VT-d / EPT | — |
| Target Use | Productivity | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i5-4302Y and Athlon 64 X2 5400+
