Core i5-4302Y vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85

Core i5-4302Y vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 Performance Spectrum

Core i5-4302Y

2 / 4

1,580

0.0%

Pentium D 940

Celeron Dual-Core T1700

Pentium Dual Core T4300

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85

2 / 2

1,585

+0.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-4302Y vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-4302Y vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-4302Y

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (12 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics 4200, while Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,580 vs 1,585).
❌25500% higher power demand at 512W vs 2W.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85

2008

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 512W, a 510W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-4302Y can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 better than Core i5-4302Y?

Yes. Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 still makes the most sense overall. Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.3% average FPS lead across 46 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4302Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2008). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-4302Y vs Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-4302Y

The Core i5-4302Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,580 points. Launch price was $281.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85

The Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Puma (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1g2. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,585 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-4302Y packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Core i5-4302Y versus 2.3 GHz on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 — identical boost frequencies. The Core i5-4302Y uses the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 uses Puma (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-4302Y scores 1,580 against the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85's 1,585 — a 0.3% lead for the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85. L3 cache: 3 MB on the Core i5-4302Y vs 0 kB on the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85.

Feature	Core i5-4302Y	Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85
Cores / Threads	2 / 4	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.3 GHz	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	1.6 GHz	—
L3 Cache	3 MB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512 kB	2 MB+300%
Process	22 nm-66%	65 nm
Architecture	Haswell (2013−2015)	Puma (2008−2009)
PassMark	1,580	1,585
Geekbench 6 Single	676	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	1,086	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-4302Y uses the FCBGA1168 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 uses S1g2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-4302Y	Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85
Socket	FCBGA1168	S1g2
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1600 / LPDDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	12	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i5-4302Y) / not specified (Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85). The Core i5-4302Y includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 4200), while the Turion X2 Ultra ZM-85 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-4302Y targets Productivity.