PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1620 vs Core i5-4302Y FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1620 vs Core i5-4302Y: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1620

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 55W instead of 512W, a 457W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Core i5-4302Y.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (441 vs 676).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (760 vs 1,086).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $52 MSRP, while Core i5-4302Y mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Core i5-4302Y

2013

Why buy it

✅+53.3% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Trade-offs

❌830.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 55W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G1620.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4302Y better than Celeron G1620?

Yes. Core i5-4302Y is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 42.9% better Geekbench multi-core, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-4302Y is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4302Y is the stronger fit. You are getting 42.9% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4302Y is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-4302Y comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $52 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G1620 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (30.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4302Y makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012), 50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G1620 vs Core i5-4302Y Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1620

The Celeron G1620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 December 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,586 points. Launch price was $208.

Core i5-4302Y

The Core i5-4302Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,580 points. Launch price was $281.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G1620 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-4302Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G1620 versus 2.3 GHz on the Core i5-4302Y — a 16% clock advantage for the Celeron G1620 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron G1620 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-4302Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1620 scores 1,586 against the Core i5-4302Y's 1,580 — a 0.4% lead for the Celeron G1620. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 441 vs 676, a 42.1% lead for the Core i5-4302Y that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 760 vs 1,086 (35.3% advantage for the Core i5-4302Y). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1620 vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4302Y.

Feature	Celeron G1620	Core i5-4302Y
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz+17%	2.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+69%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	3 MB+50%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	512 kB+100%
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	1,586	1,580
Geekbench 6 Single	441	676+53%
Geekbench 6 Multi	760	1,086+43%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1620 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4302Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1620 versus DDR3L-1600 / LPDDR3-1600 on the Core i5-4302Y — the Core i5-4302Y supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G1620 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Celeron G1620) vs 12 (Core i5-4302Y) — the Celeron G1620 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H77,B75,Z77,H61,P67,Z68 (Celeron G1620) and HM86,HM87 (Core i5-4302Y).

Feature	Celeron G1620	Core i5-4302Y
Socket	LGA1155	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	DDR3L-1600 / LPDDR3-1600+20%
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB+100%	16 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Celeron G1620) vs VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Core i5-4302Y). Both include integrated graphics — Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) (Celeron G1620) and Intel HD Graphics 4200 (Core i5-4302Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1620 targets Desktop, Core i5-4302Y targets Productivity. Direct competitor: Celeron G1620 rivals Pentium G2030.

Feature	Celeron G1620	Core i5-4302Y
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1)	Intel HD Graphics 4200
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, EPT	VT-x / VT-d / EPT
Target Use	Desktop	Productivity