Celeron G1620
VS
Core i5-3339Y

Celeron G1620 vs Core i5-3339Y

Intel

Celeron G1620

2 Cores2 Thrd55 WWMax: 2.7 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i5-3339Y

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Celeron G1620 is positioned at rank 590 and the Core i5-3339Y is on rank 412, so the Core i5-3339Y offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G1620

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10220%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9657%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7012%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2112%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1673%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1464%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
838%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
827%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
753%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
753%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
745%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
725%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
715%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
712%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
705%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
99%
#590
Celeron G1620
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
100%
#591
Core i5-7600T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $60
100%
#593
Core i3-7300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $128
98%
#594
Celeron G1830
MSRP: $52|Avg: $5
98%
#596
Core i3-4160
MSRP: $117|Avg: $52
98%
#598
FX-8350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $130
98%
#599
Athlon X4 760K
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
98%
#600
Core i5-6400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $57
98%
#602
Pentium G3460T
MSRP: $69|Avg: N/A
97%
#603
Core i3-6300
MSRP: $147|Avg: $99
97%
#604
Core i5-6402P
MSRP: $182|Avg: $120
96%
#605
Athlon II X4 620e
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-3339Y

#124
Core i5-1240P
MSRP: $309|Avg: $200
99%
#125
Core i7-13700H
MSRP: $502|Avg: N/A
98%
#400
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
554%
#401
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
546%
#402
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
501%
#403
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
499%
#404
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
494%
#406
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
477%
#407
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
458%
#408
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
457%
#409
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
445%
#412
Core i5-3339Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#421
Core i5-9400H
MSRP: $182|Avg: N/A
98%
#426
Celeron 2981U
MSRP: $137|Avg: N/A
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron G1620 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i5-3339Y is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.2% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightCeleron G1620Core i5-3339Y
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightCeleron G1620Core i5-3339Y
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Celeron G1620 and Core i5-3339Y

Intel

Celeron G1620

The Celeron G1620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 December 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,586 points. Launch price was $208.

Intel

Core i5-3339Y

The Core i5-3339Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 January 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 13 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,589 points. Launch price was $250.

Processing Power

The Celeron G1620 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-3339Y's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G1620 versus 2 GHz on the Core i5-3339Y — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Celeron G1620 (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). Both are built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Celeron G1620 scores 1,586 against the Core i5-3339Y's 1,589 — a 0.2% lead for the Core i5-3339Y. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 441 vs 368, a 18% lead for the Celeron G1620 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 760 vs 707 (7.2% advantage for the Celeron G1620). L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1620 vs 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-3339Y.

FeatureCeleron G1620Core i5-3339Y
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.7 GHz+35%
2 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz+80%
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
3 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
22 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
PassMark
1,586
1,589
Geekbench 6 Single
441+20%
368
Geekbench 6 Multi
760+7%
707
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1620 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-3339Y uses BGA1023 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Celeron G1620 versus 1600 on the Core i5-3339Y — the Core i5-3339Y supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: H77,B75,Z77,H61,P67,Z68 (Celeron G1620) and HM76,UM77,QM77,QS77 (Core i5-3339Y).

FeatureCeleron G1620Core i5-3339Y
Socket
LGA1155
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
1600+53233%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB+104857500%
32
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, EPT (Celeron G1620) vs true (Core i5-3339Y). Both include integrated graphics Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) (Celeron G1620) and Intel HD Graphics 4000 (Core i5-3339Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1620 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G1620 rivals Pentium G2030; Core i5-3339Y rivals AMD A8-4555M.

FeatureCeleron G1620Core i5-3339Y
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1)
Intel HD Graphics 4000
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, EPT
true
Target Use
Desktop