
Celeron G1620

Pentium G2030T
Celeron G1620 vs Pentium G2030T Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Celeron G1620 vs Pentium G2030T FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Celeron G1620 vs Pentium G2030T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Celeron G1620
2012Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1), while Pentium G2030T needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Pentium G2030T.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,586 vs 1,597).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 3 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.5 vs 38.0 PassMark/$ ($52 MSRP vs $42 MSRP).
- ❌57.1% higher power demand at 55W vs 35W.
Pentium G2030T
2013Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (3 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Costs $10 less on MSRP ($42 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 24.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 38.0 vs 30.5 PassMark/$ ($42 MSRP vs $52 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 55W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1620 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G1620.
Quick Answers
So, is Pentium G2030T better than Celeron G1620?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron G1620 vs Pentium G2030T Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1620
The Celeron G1620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 December 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,586 points. Launch price was $208.

Pentium G2030T
The Pentium G2030T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency: 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,597 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
Both the Celeron G1620 and Pentium G2030T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. The Celeron G1620 is built on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Celeron G1620 scores 1,586 against the Pentium G2030T's 1,597 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium G2030T. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G1620 vs 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Pentium G2030T.
| Feature | Celeron G1620 | Pentium G2030T |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.7 GHz | — |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+4% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB (total) | 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache+50% |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | — |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | — |
| PassMark | 1,586 | 1,597 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 441 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 760 | — |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1155 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Celeron G1620 | Pentium G2030T |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1155 | LGA1155 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Celeron G1620) / not specified (Pentium G2030T). The Celeron G1620 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1)), while the Pentium G2030T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1620 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G1620 rivals Pentium G2030.
| Feature | Celeron G1620 | Pentium G2030T |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1) | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Celeron G1620 was priced at $52, while the Pentium G2030T came in at $42. On launch pricing ($52 vs $42), Pentium G2030T was $10 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Celeron G1620 delivers 30.5 pts/$ vs 38.0 pts/$ for the Pentium G2030T — making the Pentium G2030T the 22% better value option.
| Feature | Celeron G1620 | Pentium G2030T |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $52 | $42-19% |
| Performance per Dollar | 30.5 | 38.0+25% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














