Celeron G1620 vs Pro A6-8500B

Celeron G1620 vs Pro A6-8500B Performance Spectrum

Celeron G1620

2 / 2

1,586

0.0%

1,592

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Celeron G1620 vs Pro A6-8500B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Celeron G1620 vs Pro A6-8500B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Celeron G1620

2012

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1), while Pro A6-8500B needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Intel Stock), unlike Pro A6-8500B.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,586 vs 1,592).
❌Launch MSRP is still $52 MSRP, while Pro A6-8500B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌5400% higher power demand at 55W vs 1W.

Pro A6-8500B

2015

Why buy it

✅Draws 1W instead of 55W, a 54W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Celeron G1620 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Celeron G1620.

Quick Answers

So, is Pro A6-8500B better than Celeron G1620?

Yes. Pro A6-8500B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Pro A6-8500B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pro A6-8500B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pro A6-8500B is still the much better call for a fresh build. Pro A6-8500B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $52 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Celeron G1620 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2012 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (30.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1155.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Pro A6-8500B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Celeron G1620 vs Pro A6-8500B Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Celeron G1620

The Celeron G1620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 December 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,586 points. Launch price was $208.

Pro A6-8500B

The Pro A6-8500B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,592 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The Celeron G1620 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Pro A6-8500B's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.7 GHz on the Celeron G1620 versus 3 GHz on the Pro A6-8500B — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Pro A6-8500B (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Celeron G1620 uses the Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Pro A6-8500B uses Carrizo (2015−2018) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Celeron G1620 scores 1,586 against the Pro A6-8500B's 1,592 — a 0.4% lead for the Pro A6-8500B.

Feature	Celeron G1620	Pro A6-8500B
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	2.7 GHz	3 GHz+11%
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+69%	1.6 GHz
L3 Cache	2 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1024 kB+300%
Process	22 nm-21%	28 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Carrizo (2015−2018)
PassMark	1,586	1,592
Geekbench 6 Single	441	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	760	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Celeron G1620 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pro A6-8500B uses FP4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Celeron G1620	Pro A6-8500B
Socket	LGA1155	FP4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, EPT (Celeron G1620) / not specified (Pro A6-8500B). The Celeron G1620 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge GT1)), while the Pro A6-8500B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G1620 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Celeron G1620 rivals Pentium G2030.