Core i5-430M
VS
Athlon II X2 250e

Core i5-430M vs Athlon II X2 250e

Intel

Core i5-430M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.53 GHz2010
VS
AMD

Athlon II X2 250e

2 Cores2 Thrd45 WWMax: 3 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-430M is positioned at rank 12 and the Athlon II X2 250e is on rank 889, so the Core i5-430M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-430M

#4
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
121%
#5
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
119%
#6
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
110%
#7
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
109%
#8
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
108%
#10
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
104%
#11
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
100%
#12
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
100%
#13
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
97%
#17
Core i3-350M
MSRP: $130|Avg: $10
90%
#18
Atom x5-E8000
MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A
89%
#19
Core 2 Duo T5900
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
88%
#22
Core i3-3130M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
79%
#23
Core 2 Duo T5550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
75%
#24
Core 2 Duo T7100
MSRP: $197|Avg: $15
75%
#27
Pentium 2030M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
72%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X2 250e

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
19969%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
18869%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
13700%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4127%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3269%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2860%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1638%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1617%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1472%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1472%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1455%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1416%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1396%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1391%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1378%
#299
Core i9-7980XE
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300
95%
#888
Core i7-2600S
MSRP: $297|Avg: $99
100%
#889
Athlon II X2 250e
MSRP: $77|Avg: $15
100%
#890
Athlon II X2 250u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
100%
#891
Pentium G6951
MSRP: $89|Avg: $50
100%
#892
Core i3-2125
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
100%
#894
Celeron G1820
MSRP: $110|Avg: $15
99%
#895
Celeron E1600
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
99%
#896
Athlon II X2 270u
MSRP: $68|Avg: $10
98%
#897
Core i5-4570TE
MSRP: $202|Avg: $40
98%
#898
Core i3-2130
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
96%
#901
Core i3-6100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $50
94%
#902
Core i3-4330TE
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
94%
#903
Pentium E5700
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i5-430M delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Athlon II X2 250e in both compute-intensive tasks (0.7% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i5-430MAthlon II X2 250e
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($33)
More affordable ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Regor (2009−2013) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Value Proposition: While both processors are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Athlon II X2 250e holds the technical lead in efficiency. Priced at $15 (vs $33), it costs 55% less. While offering basic entry-level performance, it results in a 119% higher cost efficiency score compared to the Core i5-430M.
InsightCore i5-430MAthlon II X2 250e
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+119%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($33)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-430M and Athlon II X2 250e

Intel

Core i5-430M

The Core i5-430M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,210 points. Launch price was $79.

AMD

Athlon II X2 250e

The Athlon II X2 250e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,202 points. Launch price was $77.

Processing Power

The Core i5-430M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Athlon II X2 250e's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.53 GHz on the Core i5-430M versus 3 GHz on the Athlon II X2 250e — a 17% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 250e (base: 2.26 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i5-430M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X2 250e uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-430M scores 1,210 against the Athlon II X2 250e's 1,202 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i5-430M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 350 vs 250, a 33.3% lead for the Core i5-430M that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 750 vs 470 (45.9% advantage for the Core i5-430M). L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-430M vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X2 250e.

FeatureCore i5-430MAthlon II X2 250e
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.53 GHz
3 GHz+19%
Base Clock
2.26 GHz
3 GHz+33%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
1 MB+300%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Regor (2009−2013)
PassMark
1,210
1,202
Geekbench 6 Single
350+40%
250
Geekbench 6 Multi
750+60%
470
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-430M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X2 250e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. The Athlon II X2 250e supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-430M) vs 0 (Athlon II X2 250e) — the Core i5-430M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM55 (Core i5-430M) and 760G,780G,785G,790GX (Athlon II X2 250e).

FeatureCore i5-430MAthlon II X2 250e
Socket
PGA988
AM3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-430M) vs AMD-V (Athlon II X2 250e). The Core i5-430M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Athlon II X2 250e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-430M targets Performance Laptop, Athlon II X2 250e targets Energy Efficient Legacy Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-430M rivals AMD Turion II M620; Athlon II X2 250e rivals Pentium E5700.

FeatureCore i5-430MAthlon II X2 250e
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
Performance Laptop
Energy Efficient Legacy Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At current prices ($33 vs $15), the Athlon II X2 250e is $18 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-430M delivers 36.7 pts/$ vs 80.1 pts/$ for the Athlon II X2 250e — making the Athlon II X2 250e the 74.4% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-430MAthlon II X2 250e
MSRP
$77
Avg Price (30d)
$33
$15-55%
Performance per Dollar
36.7
80.1+118%
Release Date
2010
2010