Core i5-430M
VS
Pentium E6700

Core i5-430M vs Pentium E6700

Intel

Core i5-430M

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.53 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Pentium E6700

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i5-430M is positioned at rank 12 and the Pentium E6700 is on rank 915, so the Core i5-430M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-430M

#4
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
121%
#5
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
119%
#6
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
110%
#7
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
109%
#8
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
108%
#10
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
104%
#11
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
100%
#12
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
100%
#13
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
97%
#17
Core i3-350M
MSRP: $130|Avg: $10
90%
#18
Atom x5-E8000
MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A
89%
#19
Core 2 Duo T5900
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
88%
#22
Core i3-3130M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
79%
#23
Core 2 Duo T5550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $5
75%
#24
Core 2 Duo T7100
MSRP: $197|Avg: $15
75%
#27
Pentium 2030M
MSRP: $134|Avg: N/A
72%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium E6700

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
21998%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
20786%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
15092%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4547%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3601%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3151%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1805%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1781%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1622%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1621%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1603%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1560%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1538%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1532%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1518%
#395
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4491
99%
#915
Pentium E6700
MSRP: $86|Avg: $5
100%
#916
Phenom II X4 820
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
99%
#917
Core i7-3930K
MSRP: $583|Avg: $150
99%
#919
Core i7-4930K
MSRP: $670|Avg: $100
99%
#920
Sempron LE-1250
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
99%
#921
Pentium E6500
MSRP: $84|Avg: $10
99%
#922
Core i5-2500
MSRP: $294|Avg: $69
98%
#924
Athlon II X4 605e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $25
97%
#925
Athlon II X4 610e
MSRP: $143|Avg: $20
97%
#926
Core i5-2390T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $182
97%
#927
Phenom II X4 910e
MSRP: $157|Avg: $69
97%
#928
FX-8100
MSRP: $300|Avg: $50
96%
#930
Celeron E1400
MSRP: $53|Avg: $63
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Pentium E6700 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i5-430M in both compute-intensive tasks (0.7% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightCore i5-430MPentium E6700
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($33)
More affordable ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Pentium E6700 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 85% cheaper ($5 vs $33) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightCore i5-430MPentium E6700
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+565%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($33)
More affordable ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i5-430M and Pentium E6700

Intel

Core i5-430M

The Core i5-430M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.26 GHz, with boost up to 2.53 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,210 points. Launch price was $79.

Intel

Pentium E6700

The Pentium E6700 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,219 points. Launch price was $80.

Processing Power

The Core i5-430M packs 2 cores / 4 threads, matching the Pentium E6700's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 2.53 GHz on the Core i5-430M versus 3.2 GHz on the Pentium E6700 — a 23.4% clock advantage for the Pentium E6700 (base: 2.26 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i5-430M uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Pentium E6700 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-430M scores 1,210 against the Pentium E6700's 1,219 — a 0.7% lead for the Pentium E6700. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Core i5-430M vs 0 kB on the Pentium E6700.

FeatureCore i5-430MPentium E6700
Cores / Threads
2 / 4
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.53 GHz
3.2 GHz+26%
Base Clock
2.26 GHz
3.2 GHz+42%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
2 MB (total)+700%
Process
32 nm-29%
45 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Wolfdale (2008−2010)
PassMark
1,210
1,219
Geekbench 6 Single
350
Geekbench 6 Multi
750
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-430M uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Pentium E6700 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1066 memory speed. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i5-430M) vs 0 (Pentium E6700) — the Core i5-430M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i5-430MPentium E6700
Socket
PGA988
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-430M) vs VT-x (Pentium E6700). The Core i5-430M includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics), while the Pentium E6700 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-430M targets Performance Laptop, Pentium E6700 targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i5-430M rivals AMD Turion II M620.

FeatureCore i5-430MPentium E6700
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
VT-x
Target Use
Performance Laptop
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At current prices ($33 vs $5), the Pentium E6700 is $28 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i5-430M delivers 36.7 pts/$ vs 243.8 pts/$ for the Pentium E6700 — making the Pentium E6700 the 147.7% better value option.

FeatureCore i5-430MPentium E6700
MSRP
$86
Avg Price (30d)
$33
$5-85%
Performance per Dollar
36.7
243.8+564%
Release Date
2010
2010